Dig Deeper, Invest Smarter
Shiba Inu (SHIB) trades in the green over the past 24 hours with a modest 4% gain despite whale transactions on the network dropping by a staggering 84%. The sharp drop signals reduced activity from top holders and may suggest waning interest. As whales remain on the sidelines, what’s next for Shiba Inu price? Will
The post Shiba Inu Price Steady Despite Whale Transactions Crashing 84% appeared first on CoinGape.
New York-based legal firm Burwick Law filed a class action lawsuit against the main parties involved in LIBRA, the Argentinian meme coin scandal. The lawsuit specifically targets KIP, Meteora, and Kelsier, but not President Javier Milei.
Over the past few months, the firm has filed several lawsuits against meme coin projects. It alleges serious financial misconduct from all these parties.
Given the firm’s recent actions, Burwick Law seems to be in a legal war against meme coin scammers. In December, it filed a suit against Hawk Tuah’s promoters. A month later, it sued Pump.fun, accusing the platform of IP violations.
Yesterday, Burwick filed another class-action lawsuit, this time centered around the LIBRA meme coin.
“Tonight, our firm filed a class action complaint in the Supreme Court of New York on behalf of our client. We allege that Kelsier, KIP, Meteora, and related parties orchestrated an unfair token launch (LIBRA), allegedly misleading purchasers and harming retail investors,” the firm claimed via social media.
The LIBRA launch in February turned into a massive fiasco, and this lawsuit joins active investigations and arrest warrants levied upon the principal actors.
Essentially, Burwick accuses several parties involved with LIBRA of “deceptive, manipulative, and fundamentally unfair” conduct. These people artificially inflated the token’s price and then caused a collapse—otherwise known as pump-and-dump.
Surprisingly, the suit does not name Argentine President Javier Milei as a defendant. In addition to being a significant political figure, Milei also downplayed his direct connections to the debacle.
Instead of targeting him, Burwick’s lawsuit is going after the private companies that directly facilitated the LIBRA launch: KIT, Meteora, and Kelsier.
“The complaint details how, according to our allegations, one-sided liquidity pools were used to artificially inflate LIBRA’s price. We further allege that approximately 85% of supply was withheld at launch, enabling insiders to profit while everyday buyers bore the losses,” Burwick Law stated.
The initial name behind the LIBRA meme coin launch was KIP Protocol, a Web3 AI base layer. However, the firm completely distanced itself from any rug pull allegations.
KIP claimed that it did not launch or profit from LIBRA and that it was only asked “to assist in managing the project’s financing initiative.” The other firms, however, have much clearer connections.
Meteora, a decentralized crypto exchange, was thoroughly involved in LIBRA. The company’s co-founder resigned in the immediate aftermath but maintained his innocence.
Notably, Meteora’s reputation was already damaged by the TRUMP meme coin. This small exchange was the first platform to host the token, which increased its TVL by over 300% in days to over $1.9 billion.
Kelsier Ventures, LIBRA’s market maker, seems especially vulnerable to lawsuits. In a shocking interview, CEO Hayden Davis defended his actions, admitting to past scams and claiming he did nothing out of the ordinary.
Davis was in talks to launch a similar meme coin with the Nigerian government and was recently tied to a Wolf of Wall Street-themed meme coin. It’s no wonder that Davis, of all the names involved with the whole scandal, is the only person with an active arrest warrant against him.
Additionally, data engineer Fernando Molina alleged that these parties tried to launch two other Argentina-centric tokens before LIBRA. A few telltale fingerprints connect it with ARG and MILEI, such as shared wallets, liquidity pools, and timing. Molina suggested that LIBRA’s creators could’ve created these assets as test coins, but isn’t certain.
There are quite a few unanswered questions about the whole LIBRA scandal, and it’s unclear how they’ll play into the lawsuit. Hopefully, investigations can help clear up some of the biggest mysteries.
After all, political meme coin schemes like this can damage the reputation of the whole industry. So, the current lawsuit from Burwick might be in everyone’s best interest.
The post Burwick Law Files Lawsuit Against Meteora and Other LIBRA Backers appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Layer-1 (L1) coin CFX has emerged as the top-performing altcoin today, hitting its highest price level since December 9, 2024.
The rally follows a series of recent ecosystem updates that have significantly boosted trading activity and investor sentiment around CFX. With demand continuing to strengthen, the coin appears well-positioned for further upside in the short term.
CFX currently trades at $0.23, climbing 83% over the past day. Over the past week, the coin’s price has increased by over 110%.
CFX’s price surge is largely driven by anticipation of its Tree Graph 3.0 mainnet upgrade, set to launch in August. The upgrade promises a major performance boost, enabling up to 15,000 transactions per second. It also introduces support for AI agents, real-world asset settlements, and cross-border payments, aimed at strengthening Web3 infrastructure in Asia.
Further, Conflux is developing an offshore RMB stablecoin in collaboration with AnchorX, Dongxin, and Ping An. The stablecoin is expected to gain traction through upcoming pilot programs in Central and Southeast Asia, expanding Conflux’s regional relevance.
Adding to its momentum, Conflux recently partnered with MetYa, an AI-centric SocialFi platform. These updates have culminated in a surge of demand for CFX, significantly driving up its value over the past few days.
According to Santiment, CFX’s social dominance—a metric that tracks the percentage of crypto-related discussions focused on the asset—has soared to an all-time high. Per the on-chain data provider, this stood at 0.74% at press time, confirming the notable surge in online chatter about CFX.
For token TA and market updates: Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.
This confirms that the altcoin has captured significant attention in the broader market conversation, a trend that is often a precursor to increased retail activity and short-term price momentum.
Moreover, over the past three days, CFX’s Smart Money Index (SMI) has climbed, indicating rising interest from influential investors and large holders. Readings from this indicator show that its value has risen by 46% since July 19.
Smart money refers to capital controlled by institutional investors or experienced traders who understand market trends and timing more deeply. The SMI tracks the behavior of these investors by analyzing intraday price movements.
It measures selling in the morning (when retail traders dominate) versus buying in the afternoon (when institutions are more active).
A rising SMI like this signals that smart money is accumulating CFX, often ahead of major price moves — a trend primarily driven by the upcoming launch of the Tree-Graph 3.0 mainnet upgrade, which is set for the next few days.
Sustained buying pressure could see CFX break above its immediate resistance at $0.2484. A successful breach of this level could drive its price toward $0.306, a high last reached in April 2024.
However, if market participants resume profit-taking, this bullish projection will be invalidated. In that case, the coin’s price could fall to $0.1664.
The post Conflux (CFX) Hits 7-Month High as On-Chain Metrics Signal Further Upside appeared first on BeInCrypto.
During the 2025 edition of the Paris Blockchain Week, BeInCrypto sat down with Alexis Yellow, CEO of Yellow, a crypto project working on an entirely new paradigm based on Satoshi’s initial vision for Bitcoin.
He talks about the upcoming Yellow Tokens, a new smart contract mechanism, and making crypto projects more utility-driven.
I’m Alexis, a software engineer by background. I worked at the European Space Center early in my career, but my crypto journey started quite unexpectedly.
Back in 2013, an old friend from school reached out—he was working at Goldman Sachs and told me about a project that needed help. He said, “There are 12 people in Silicon Valley printing fake money.” That project turned out to be Ripple.
Ripple ended up being our first client, and that experience really helped me grasp the potential of crypto.
Despite the skepticism surrounding the space, I saw real innovation. Ripple’s CTO was a Bitcoin Core contributor, and Vitalik Buterin was involved with the team before Ethereum.
Actually, Buterin was planning to join Ripple. He was especially excited about their consensus mechanism, which inspired me, too.
So, we started in 2013 by doing market-making and tackling challenges in crypto liquidity and infrastructure.
One thing that always stuck with me was Satoshi’s idea: We need systems where trust isn’t a prerequisite. That idea shaped a lot of my thinking.
Around 2018–2019, I decided to start Yellow. We later merged with a French exchange technology company called OpenWare. Combining my market experience with their tech, we launched Yellow Network.
So, it’s a trading infrastructure designed to let institutions, like Société Générale, trade directly with major players like Binance without needing to trust them.
Exactly that’s at the core of Satoshi’s vision. At Yellow, we’re working on a different model of trustlessness using state channels, which represent a new paradigm compared to traditional blockchain systems like Bitcoin or Ethereum.
In those systems, you have tens of thousands of nodes, say, around 30,000, validating each transaction. It’s a powerful model for security, each validator has a financial incentive to be honest, and there’s no way to roll back a confirmed transaction.
The same applies to staking networks. But that structure just doesn’t work for high-frequency trading. You can’t have 30,000 nodes verifying every microsecond trade. It’s simply too slow and inefficient.
For example, some networks try to solve this by reducing the number of validators to 21, but that compromises the level of trust and decentralization. Our approach is fundamentally different. The Lightning Network inspires it, but we’ve taken it in a new direction.
With the Lightning Network, you can move money instantly by opening a state channel. At Yellow Network, we use similar state channels but instead of transferring funds directly, we transfer profit and loss in real time.
For instance, if you buy a Bitcoin for $100,000 and it rises 5%, the $5,000 profit is immediately transferred to your wallet. The trade is settled instantly, peer-to-peer, with cryptographic proof.
To ensure security and fairness, we’ve built a smart contract called ClearSync. If a counterparty refuses to settle, as we saw with the HyperLiquid issue recently, ClearSync can step in and arbitrate the trade.
It verifies the claim and, if valid, ensures the rightful party receives what they’re owed. So, it’s a trustless system that still allows for the speed and flexibility traders need.
1/ $JELLYJELLY on @HyperliquidX and what happens when we rely on trust.
Price manipulation. Emergency delisting. Forced settlement.
It’s 2025. Trustless trading is here and we can trade with CEX’s without trust.
What happened and why @Yellow is built to prevent this.
— Yellow (@Yellow) March 27, 2025
No, it’s peer-to-peer trading. Nothing is faster or more efficient than a direct state channel between two parties. Profit is transferred instantly. That’s the core of this new paradigm: trustless trading, where settlement happens in real time.
Let’s say we’re trading and the connection drops, no problem. If I made a profit, it’s already secured. I might not receive the asset, like Bitcoin, but my profit in dollars is locked in. There’s no need to trust the other party to settle correctly.
It’s effective profit, denominated in dollars or whatever currency is locked as collateral. Here’s how it works – two parties lock in $20,000 to trade Bitcoin. That amount represents the maximum they’re willing to risk.
If the trade results in a $5,000 profit for one side, that amount is instantly settled, even if the other party refuses to finalize the trade.
If both agree to settle, I send you $100,000, you send me one Bitcoin, and both our collaterals unlock.
Absolutely. In fact, we’re working with stablecoin issuers to create partnerships and potential investments in Yellow.
We haven’t officially launched. Before the war in Ukraine, we had a large team of over 100 people. Many have since relocated, mostly to Poland, but we still have staff in Ukraine. Right now, we’re about 50 people globally.
Meanwhile, you can track activity on our analytics site, BundleBear. On Polygon, we’re already the fourth most active app. On Linea, a new protocol by Consensys, we’re number one with over 229,000 users despite not being live yet.
Exactly. The Yellow Wallet is like a Layer 3; it lets users interact with any chain seamlessly. It now supports cross-chain swaps, like moving tokens from Polygon to Binance Smart Chain, with zero fees. It’s designed to remove friction from cross-chain trading.
Seamless cross-chain swaps, all in your Yellow Wallet!
Swap between BNB, Base, Arbitrum, AVAX, Polygon, OP, Linea, and Scroll with ease.
The more you swap, the more daily claim points you earn. pic.twitter.com/6DnnVbfR7a
— Yellow (@Yellow) April 23, 2025
No, not for the state channels themselves. We don’t monetize trades directly. The Yellow token plays a security role, a “necessary evil,” like ETH or BTC.
Your security deposit gets burned if you behave badly and refuse to settle. It ensures honesty in a peer-to-peer environment. Think of it like a miner losing their reward for trying to cheat.
The token economy is the foundation. Just like ETH or BTC derive value from usage and network participation, the Yellow token does too.
It’s needed to place security deposits in the network, and over time, its utility and adoption by industry players will drive its value.
If someone cheats, their token gets burned—creating deflationary pressure and reinforcing good behavior.
Not yet, but we’re planning to launch in the next couple of months. We’ll mint 10 billion Yellow tokens; ideally, that number stays close to that.
If too many tokens get burned, it could indicate issues in the system. It’s a built-in signal to monitor the health and integrity of the network.
No, we’re focused on utility-based distribution. Most tokens will be sold directly in the markets where they’re used. Ethereum didn’t launch with an airdrop. Neither did Bitcoin.
This is a B2B infrastructure project—just like Ethereum and Ripple. While the network is open to everyone, our core users are businesses and institutional players.
That said, the beauty of crypto is that the ecosystem is open. Anyone who believes in the project can get involved and benefit from the network effect, without needing to be a developer or an insider.
Yes, very few cryptocurrencies are used in the real world today. Bitcoin has proven its value as a store of wealth.
Ethereum demonstrated its utility during the ICO boom. USDT fills a vital gap in places where dollars are hard to access.
We believe Yellow can become the fourth pillar. It’s solving a real need in crypto markets: scalable, trustless, high-frequency trading. And we’re making it open source so the whole industry can benefit.
It’s obvious that Web3 applications will need infrastructure to reach the scale of platforms like Twitter or YouTube.
At Pragma today, @Yellow‘s Louis Bellet shared the secret weapon Ethereum already has to achieve this today.
Full talk coming up in the next few days
pic.twitter.com/tPa7ZELSX3
— ETHGlobal (@ETHGlobal) April 3, 2025
I think this approach, state channels for speed and smart contracts for resolution, will redefine how trading infrastructure works. It’s ideal for gaming and other fast-paced applications where blockchains never truly fit.
Blockchain isn’t always the answer, especially if you’re using 30,000 nodes to validate a game move. That’s just not efficient.
With Yellow, the trading side is handled through cryptographic state channels not full decentralization. But if something goes wrong, we still fall back to a smart contract to arbitrate. That’s the balance we’re bringing.
Also, we’re working on a new ERC standard for this. In the next 3–4 years, I expect that 10–20% of new crypto projects will adopt this architecture.
Overall, We’re not just building a product, we’re introducing a new philosophy for how decentralized systems can operate more efficiently.
The post Yellow Network’s Trustless Trading and Token Launch – Interview with Alexis Serkia appeared first on BeInCrypto.
