SafeMoon’s price has climbed over 25% in the past week amid the broader market volatility. This double-digit price gain has been fueled by the uptick in the token’s demand following the project’s migration from BNB Chain to Solana.
However, profit-taking and increased selling pressure are now threatening to erase some of SFM’s recent gains. This analysis provides the details.
SafeMoon Battles Growing Sell-Offs
An assessment of the SFM/USD one-day chart highlights the growing selling pressure within SFM’s spot markets. A notable indicator of this trend is the token’s negative Balance of Power (BoP), which is at -0.96 at press time.
An asset’s BoP indicator compares buyers’ and sellers’ strengths by analyzing price movements within a given period. When its value is negative like this, it indicates that sellers have more control, meaning downward pressure is stronger, and the asset is likely experiencing a bearish trend.
This suggests weakening bullish momentum among SFM holders and hints at declines if selling pressure continues.
Furthermore, SFM’s price has dropped 8% over the past 24 hours, causing the altcoin to trade near its 20-day exponential moving average (EMA).
This moving average measures an asset’s average price over the past 20 trading days, giving more weight to recent prices to identify short-term trends.
As with SFM, when an asset’s price is poised to break below the 20-day EMA, it signals increased selling pressure. It is a sign of weakening bullish momentum and a shift toward a bearish trend.
SFM Finds Key Support at $0.000061
A successful breach of the dynamic support offered by SafeMoon’s 20-day EMA at $0.000061 would strengthen the bearish trend. In this scenario, the altcoin’s price could plummet further to $0.000047.
However, a spike in new demand would invalidate this bearish outlook. If spot inflows rally, it could drive SFM’s price above the resistance at $0.000068 toward its multi-year high at $0.000011.
In an exclusive interview with BeInCrypto, former US CFTC Commissioner Timothy Massad explains how President Trump’s crypto ventures and political power have significantly overlapped in his first two months at the White House.
Shortly before assuming office for the second time, US President Donald Trump dove head-first into a flurry of crypto experiments. From endorsing World Liberty Financial (WLFI) to launching his meme coin, Trump is raising serious concerns over conflicts of interest. Tim Massad, the 12th CFTC Chairman, who served under Barack Obama, shares his thoughts.
A Historic President For Many Reasons
Before assuming his first term in office in 2016, President Trump broke with modern precedent by departing from established conflict-of-interest norms. A real estate mogul with a trademark for a last name, Trump would be entering the Oval Office as the leader of a multi-billion dollar empire.
While former presidents like Jimmy Carter and George W. Bush took measures to separate themselves from their businesses by placing their assets in a blind trust, the sitting President took a different approach.
Instead, Trump handed day-to-day management decisions over to his sons but did not divest in his ownership stake.
Though he received much backlash during his first term over conflict of interest concerns, Trump refused to relinquish ownership of the Trump Organization before assuming office for the second time.
Given Trump’s favorable stance toward digital asset policy development, players inside and outside the industry have begun to wonder whether his decisions are based on the sector’s best interests or are designed to benefit his own ventures.
How Deep is Trump’s Involvement in World Liberty Financial?
Though Trump does not have a direct role in WLFI, he appears on the whitepaper’s list of supporting teams as “Chief Crypto Advocate.” His three sons, Eric, Donald Jr., and Barron, are also on the list.
Reports further unveiled that the Trump family holds a 75% stake in the platform’s net revenue and a 60% stake in the holding company. At the same time, Trump and his associates own 22.5 billion of the company’s tokens.
For former CFTC Commissioner Tim Massad, despite Trump’s informal role in WLF’s governance, his stake in the platform’s performance raises serious conflicts of interest.
“I think it’s unprecedented and plainly wrong for a President of the United States to engage in commercial ventures or have his family and associates engage in commercial ventures that can be directly influenced by the policies he adopts as President or the statements he makes about those policies,” Massad told BeInCrypto.
Meanwhile, the tokens themselves are non-transferrable, limiting financial flexibility. Though the project aims to provide token holders access to a range of DeFi-related products and services, it has yet to launch them. In the meantime, token holders will have to wait until the time comes to use their tokens.
“I have yet to see any real business case or utility that’s of value to people who invest. So I think it all just has a character of taking advantage of people,” Massad added.
The industry has also grown weary over how WLF and other Trump-endorsed projects could be used to gain the President’s favor.
Industry Leaders Voice Concerns Over World Liberty Financial’s Legitimacy
Shortly before Trump launched World Liberty Financial, many prominent figures in the crypto sector warned that the project could cause Trump further legal troubles. Meanwhile, Alex Miller, CEO of Web3 platform Hiro, described the project as an “obvious pump scheme.”
Meanwhile, Alex Miller, CEO of Web3 platform Hiro, described the project as an “obvious pump scheme.”
Just fucking shoot me
Anyone who thinks this is good for crypto, that it doesn’t make us look like clowns, that it doesn’t set us back YEARS in credibility….
This is such an obvious pump scheme. Maybe he won’t literally rug but he’s just grifting and it’s pathetic pic.twitter.com/8bTGmUfLvG
Other industry leaders, such as Mark Cuban, Max Keiser, and Anthony Scaramucci, also criticized Trump’s decision to proceed with WLF’s token sales. Trump’s involvement in the project heightened fears that crypto’s fragile public image and controversial reputation would be smeared further.
Massad agreed with this last point, adding that crypto policy development is alive and well today more than ever. The ongoing development of stablecoin regulations, open talks of a national crypto strategic reserve, and a Senate-driven digital asset working group are only some of the current institutional initiatives.
“He, the Trump Organization and his family members should not be engaging in commercial ventures that pose such blatant conflicts of interest, given the fact that crypto regulation and things like a potential Bitcoin reserve are important policy issues today. A US president shouldn’t be engaging in these things at all, in my view,” Massad said.
Since the project’s launch six months ago, several examples validating these concerns have emerged. The most notable one has focused on Tron founder Justin Sun.
The move was highly controversial. Despite Trump’s endorsement, WLFI struggled to meet its $30 million fundraising target during its first public sale. The token’s availability was restricted, excluding general trading and limiting purchases to non-US and accredited US investors.
Sun’s investment turned WLFI’s luck around. Soon after that, he also became one of the project’s advisors. Then, on the day of Trump’s inauguration, Sun invested an additional $45 million in the project, bringing the total sum to $75 million.
This investment brought varying degrees of scrutiny. While some questioned his quick transition from investor to advisor, others pointed to Sun’s past as a potential motive for his contributions.
In March 2023, the SEC filed fraud charges and other securities law violations against Sun and his companies. This regulatory baggage has led some industry leaders to question the wisdom of his association with World Liberty Financial.
Meanwhile, Tron’s price soared following Sun’s latest WLF investment. Tron, which had been experiencing lagging prices up until that point, was able to jumpstart its trading activities.
TRON Price Surge Following Sun’s $45 Million Investment in World Liberty Financial. Source: TradingView.
However, these conflicts of interest are not just limited to Sun’s investment.
Zhao could also benefit from an agreement. In 2023, he pleaded guilty to federal charges for failing to implement adequate anti-money-laundering measures at Binance.
Following his plea, Zhao resigned as Binance’s CEO. Motive-driven speculations point toward the possibility of a potential presidential pardon.
For Massad, maneuvers like these are natural when a president directly involves himself in crypto ventures.
“I think there is a huge risk of conflicts of interest and corruption by virtue of the President and people associated with him selling crypto assets—whether that’s through World Liberty Financial or the meme coins. It creates the potential for ongoing conflicts, because people who might want to curry favor with the administration could buy the coins,” Massad told BeInCrypto.
All the while, Trump benefits his crypto ventures every time he makes a pro-crypto announcement.
Is Trump Manipulating the Crypto Market?
A week into March, Trump signed an executive order to establish a Crypto Strategic Reserve and a US Digital Asset Stockpile. In his original announcement, Trump said the reserve would include Bitcoin, Ethereum, and altcoins like XRP, ADA, and SOL.
The crypto market responded immediately, with all five cryptocurrencies posting strong gains. Yet, Trump’s announcement quickly raised concerns over potential market manipulation.
With Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP in its treasury, WLF’s holdings grew in value as those assets appreciated. This growth could have boosted investor confidence, leading to higher demand for WLF tokens.
The crypto market’s overall surge and attention to Trump-related projects also generated greater investor interest in WLF, contributing to its price appreciation.
Meanwhile, Trump’s meme coin surged following the President’s reserve announcement. While TRUMP’s price stood at $13.55, with a trading volume of almost $1.2 billion on March 2, those numbers surged to $17.46 and $3.6 billion, respectively, following the news a day later.
On March 4, TRUMP’s price and trading volume plummeted below the numbers they registered only two days earlier.
“I think the meme coins have looked like a classic pump-and-dump scheme or money grab. I don’t think the issue should be, why not let people invest in these things if they want to? Of course they should have the right to invest in whatever they want. The issue is the propriety of the President of the United States selling things that capitalize on his being the President,” said Massad.
Even Ethereum Co-Founder Vitalik Buterin touched on the damaging effects of political meme coins in a social media post published five days after TRUMP’s launch.
“Now is the time to talk about the fact that large-scale political coins cross a further line: they are not just sources of fun, whose harm is at most contained to mistakes made by voluntary participants, they are vehicles for unlimited political bribery, including from foreign nation states,” Buterin said.
There is perhaps an analogy with weed here.
Ten years ago, to many weed represented freedom, and rebellion against sclerotic old order that denied self-sovereignty over our bodies. Then, weed became legalized, and “official”.
On that day, I remember my personal interest in weed…
Given Trump’s active participation in the crypto industry over the past several months, a vital question remains: Why hasn’t Trump been held accountable over these apparent conflicts of interest?
The answer remains short and bitter: He can’t be.
Can Trump Be Held Accountable?
The potential conflicts of interest arising from Donald Trump’s involvement in the cryptocurrency industry have drawn the attention of various political figures, particularly those focused on government ethics and oversight.
US Senator Elizabeth Warren has been the most vocal opponent of Trump’s dealings in the crypto industry.
“I write today to request information about how you, as President Trump’s ‘Crypto Czar,’ have addressed your conflicts of interest, and how you will prevent the President and other private individuals from directly profiting off of the Trump Administration’s efforts to selectively pump the value of certain crypto assets, drop crypto asset-related enforcement actions, and deregulate the crypto asset industry. These actions have the potential to benefit billionaire investors, Trump Administration insiders, and speculators at the expense of middle-class families,” Elizabeth Warren wrote.
However, not much else can be done beyond letters that demand responses and clarifications from the Trump administration.
The Legal Loophole
US Presidents are largely exempted from conflict of interest provisions. This exemption has been based on legal interpretations that argue these laws could impede the President’s ability to fulfill their constitutional duties.
“The problem is, the POTUS is not subject to the conflict-of-interest laws that apply to most other executive branch officeholders. There is the Foreign Emoluments Clause in the Constitution, which prohibits accepting gifts from foreign countries. There’s also a domestic clause that prohibits accepting gifts from the government. But beyond that, he’s not subject to the usual conflict-of-interest standards. So, it’s unfortunate that we don’t have those standards applicable to a president. I think, had any other president done these things, there would be far more outrage,” Massad told BeInCrypto.
Given the legal circumstances, public scrutiny and political pressure are the best ways to hold a president accountable for potential conflicts of interest.
Yet, despite the legal exemptions for sitting presidents, the ethical implications of Trump’s crypto dealings remain undeniable.
As the lines between political power and personal profit continue to blur, the necessity for clear ethical standards, even without legal mandates, becomes increasingly urgent.
Failing to do so might erode public trust in the crypto industry, generating potentially irreversible consequences.
This week kicked off on a positive note for Bitcoin ETFs, as institutional investors are making a strong comeback. On Monday, Bitcoin ETFs recorded over $380 million in net inflows, marking their largest single-day inflow since January 30.
The spike in capital inflow signals a renewed wave of institutional confidence in the leading coin, following an extended period of subdued activity in the ETF market.
Bitcoin ETFs Record Strong $381 Million Inflows
On Monday, net inflows in BTC ETFs totaled $381.40 million. The last time Bitcoin ETFs saw such a substantial injection of funds in a single day was nearly 13 weeks ago, making this latest surge notable.
The influx of capital reflects a resurgence in bullish bias among institutional investors toward BTC, at a time when broader sentiment has remained relatively cautious.
Total Bitcoin Spot ETF Net Inflow. Source: SosoValue
Yesterday, Ark Invest and 21Shares’ ETF ARKB recorded the largest daily net inflow, totaling $116.13 million, bringing its total cumulative net inflows to $2.60 billion.
Fidelity’s ETF FBTC came in second place with a net inflow of $87.61 million. The ETF’s total historical net inflows now stand at $11.37 billion.
Investor Confidence Rises
BTC has recorded a modest 1% gain over the past 24 hours. This price surge has prompted an uptick in the count of new open contracts in the coin’s futures market, reflected by its rising futures open interest. At press time, this is at $58.46 billion, climbing 5% over the past day.
An asset’s open interest measures its total number of outstanding derivative contracts, such as futures or options that have not been settled or closed.
When BTC’s open interest rises along with its price, it indicates that more traders are entering the market, either opening new long or short positions. This is a bullish signal confirming growing investor interest in the king coin.
Further, BTC’s funding rate is positive at press time, highlighting the market’s confidence in its future price performance. This currently stands at 0.0068%.
When an asset’s funding rate is positive like this, long traders pay short traders. This means that more traders are betting on BTC’s going up, reflecting bullish market sentiment.
Moreover, today’s high demand for calls in the BTC options market supports this bullish outlook. According to Deribit, BTC’s put-to-call ratio is currently at 0.71.
This indicates that more call options are traded than puts, suggesting a bullish bias among options traders. This low ratio reflects growing investor confidence and expectations of upward price movement.
The decentralized finance (DeFi) sector faced another major setback this weekend as two protocols, Loopscale and Term Finance, suffered exploits totaling over $7 million in losses.
These incidents have fueled growing concerns about the vulnerabilities of DeFi platforms in 2025.
Loopscale Loses $5.8 Million in Major Exploit
On April 26, Solana-based Loopscale reported a significant security breach impacting its USDC and SOL vaults.
The exploit drained around $5.8 million, representing roughly 12% of the platform’s total value. Notably, this attack came just two weeks after Loopscale’s official launch.
Loopscale’s co-founder, Mary Gooneratne, confirmed that an attacker exploited the system by securing under-collateralized loans.
Investigations revealed that the root cause stemmed from an isolated issue in the platform’s RateX-based collateral pricing system.
However, Loopscale clarified that RateX itself was not compromised.
“The root cause of the exploit has been identified as an isolated issue with Loopscale’s pricing of RateX-based collateral. There is no issue with RateX itself related to this. Loss of funds explicitly affects depositors to SOL and USDC Genesis vaults,” Loopscale stated.
Following the breach, Loopscale temporarily halted all markets to assess the damage.
The platform has since resumed partial operations, enabling key functions like loan repayments, top-ups, and loop closures, while vault withdrawals remain restricted.
The platform requested the return of 90% of the stolen assets and warned of legal action if the attacker did not respond by April 28.
“We agree to allow you to retain a bounty of 10% of the funds (3,947 SOL) and release you from any and all liability regarding the attack,” Loopscale added.
Loopscale is currently working with security firms and law enforcement agencies to manage the situation.
Term Finance Suffers $1.5 Million Liquidation Loss
Meanwhile, Ethereum-based Term Finance, a pioneer in scalable fixed-rate lending, also reported a security incident on April 26.
Blockchain security firm TenArmorAlert identified two suspicious transactions linked to Term Labs, resulting in losses of about $1.5 million.
“It appears that something is wrong with the liquidation. Someone spent a very small amount of ETH to liquidate over 586 Treehouse collateral,” TenArmorAlert stated.
Term Finance later confirmed that a faulty update to its tETH oracle caused the problem. Fortunately, no smart contracts were exploited, and the issue was contained within the tETH markets.
The platform assured users that all other funds remain secure and has committed to a full reimbursement plan for those affected.
These attacks contribute to a worrying trend in 2025, with crypto projects losing close to $2 billion this year.
BNB (@cz_binance) 
