FTX has taken legal action against two token issuers in a valiant attempt to recover its assets. The embattled exchange says it will begin lawsuits against entities in possession of its assets that refuse to cooperate in a last-ditch attempt to fulfill bankruptcy obligations.
FTX Rolls Out Full Legal Armada Against Token Issuers
According to a press release, FTX says it has opened lawsuits against token issuers with its assets that have avoided negotiations. Per the release, FTX’s latest legal case targets NFT Stars Limited and KUROSEMI for failing to engage with FTX to resolve the issue.
FTX says the decision to head to the courts is a last-ditch effort to bring unresponsive token issuers to the negotiation table. The exchange claims that the duo of NFT Stars Limited and KUROSEMI owes the bankrupt exchange contractually entitled tokens.
Per the statement, the exchange notes that previous attempts to seek an amicable resolution with the duo have gone unanswered.
“Our team continues to work tirelessly to maximize recoveries for the FTX Estate and return funds to creditors including by filing two complaints against issuers who have repeatedly ignored our attempts to engage,” said FTX.
FTX is racing to recover its assets to fulfill its obligations to creditors after its implosion in 2022. After its bankruptcy filing, the exchange uncovered a trail of misappropriation with a sizable amount of its assets helped by third-party token issuers.
To fulfill its obligations, FTX unlocked $21M SOL as part of its creditor repayment plans, but the troubled exchange faces an uphill climb.
Beleaguered Exchange Issues Warning To Issuers
In the press release, FTX notes that it will not be resting on its laurels after commencing legal action against KUROSEMI and NFT Stars Limited. The firm says it will double its efforts to recover its assets, urging entities to respond to correspondence on the matter.
“We urge token and coin issuers to return assets that rightfully belong to FTX, and are willing to initiate litigation barring adequate engagement,” read the press release.
FTX is receiving legal representation from Sullivan & Cromwell, while Alvarez & Marsal North America is serving as financial advisor. In other news, sport apparel brand Nike is the subject of a $5M lawsuit alleging a rugpull, following its closure of NFT marketplace RTFKT.
Despite the heightened activity, the FTX token continues its steep descent, losing nearly 3% over the last day. Bitcoin price climbing above $95K failed to trigger a similar rally for FTT as bankruptcy proceedings reach a fervent pitch.
Bitcoin might be on the edge of a massive breakout, at least, that’s what crypto analyst Timothy Peterson believes. Based on key market signals, he says Bitcoin could reach $135,000 in just 100 days, and the reasons behind this are worth a closer look.
What Does the VIX Have to Do with Bitcoin?
At the center of Peterson’s prediction is the VIX, a volatility index that tracks how uncertain investors are about the market. When it spikes, it usually means fear is high.
The 4 Things I’m Watching that Point to Bitcoin New ATH in 100 Days.
In order of least important to most important. (Day 3, continued tomorrow) $VIX and Volatility. I described this here: https://t.co/k0YFtsc0ft
In April, the VIX closed above 56, something that’s happened only twice in modern history, during the 2008 financial crash and the 2020 COVID market panic. In both cases, what followed was a strong bounce back, especially for tech stocks like those in the NASDAQ.
Peterson noticed that after a VIX spike, the NASDAQ gained around 10% in the first week, then soared by another 40% over the next 100 trading days.
Bitcoin Is Acting Like a Tech Stock
What’s surprising is that Bitcoin seems to be moving in a similar pattern to the NASDAQ’s historical rebound. Peterson says the data shows Bitcoin is tracking the NASDAQ’s recovery with 95% accuracy, a striking similarity.
But since Bitcoin is more volatile, the impact could be bigger. If market fear (VIX) continues to drop, especially below 18, which is seen as a “risk-on” zone, Peterson predicts Bitcoin could hit $107,000 in a few weeks and rise to $135,000 within 100 days.
As of now, Bitcoin price is trading around $96,296, reflecting a drop of 0.51% with a market cap hitting $1.9 trillion. Looking at the price chart, Bitcoin formed a “local bottom” between February and April 2025. It also stayed above a key line called the Kijun, strengthening the trend.
Bitcoin’s price action shows it may be ready for a breakout. If it stays above $95,800, expect more upside soon.
Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!
Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.
The post Bitcoin To Hit $135k in 100 Days? Here’s Why Top Analyst Thinks So appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News
Bitcoin might be on the edge of a massive breakout, at least, that’s what crypto analyst Timothy Peterson believes. Based on key market signals, he says Bitcoin could reach $135,000 in just 100 days, and the reasons behind this are worth a closer look. What Does the VIX Have to Do with Bitcoin? At the …
The collapse of the MANTRA (OM) token has left investors reeling, with many facing significant losses. As analysts comb through the causes of the collapse, many questions remain.
BeInCrypto consulted industry experts to identify five critical red flags behind MANTRA’s downfall and reveal strategies investors can adopt to steer clear of similar pitfalls in the future.
MANTRA (OM) Crash: What Investors Missed and How to Avoid Future Losses
On April 13, BeInCrypto broke the news of OM’s 90% crash. The collapse raised several concerns, with investors accusing the team of orchestrating a pump-and-dump scheme. Experts believe that there were many early signs of trouble.
In addition, the project adopted an inflationary tokenomic model with an uncapped supply, replacing the previous hard cap. As part of this transition, the total token supply was also increased to 1.7 billion.
However, the move wasn’t without drawbacks. According to Jean Rausis, co-founder of SMARDEX, tokenomics was a point of concern in the OM collapse.
“The project doubled its token supply to 1.77 billion in 2024 and shifted to an inflationary model, which diluted its original holders. Complex vesting favored insiders, while low circulating supply and massive FDV fueled hype and price manipulation,” Jean Rausis told BeInCrypto.
Moreover, the team’s control over the OM supply also raised centralization concerns. Experts believe this was also a factor that could have led to the alleged price manipulation.
“About 90% of OM tokens were held by the team, indicating a high level of centralization that could potentially lead to manipulation. The team also maintained control over governance, which undermined the project’s decentralized nature,” said Phil Fogel, co-founder of Cork.
Phil Fogel acknowledged that a concentrated token supply isn’t always a red flag. However, it’s crucial for investors to know who holds large amounts, their lock-up terms, and whether their involvement aligns with the project’s decentralization goals.
Moreover, Ming Wu, the founder of RabbitX, also argued that analyzing this data is essential to uncover any potential risks that could undermine the project in the long term.
“Tools like bubble maps can help identify potential risks related to token distribution,” Wu advised.
2. OM Price Action
2025 has been marked as the year of significant market volatility. The broader macroeconomic pressures have weighed heavily on the market, with the majority of the coins experiencing steep losses. Yet, OM’s price action was relatively stable until the latest crash.
OM vs. TOTAL Market Performance. Source: TradingView
“The biggest red flag was simply the price action. The whole market was going down, and nobody cared about MANTRA, and yet its token price somehow kept pumping in unnatural patterns – pump, flat, pump, flat again,” Jean Rausis disclosed.
He added that this was a clear sign of a potential issue or problem with the project. Nevertheless, he noted that identifying the differentiating price action would require some technical analysis know-how. Thus, investors lacking the knowledge would have easily missed it.
Despite this, Rausis highlighted that even the untrained eye could find other signs that something was off, ultimately leading to the crash.
Strategies to Protect Yourself
While investors remained optimistic about OM’s resilience amid a market downturn, this ended up costing them millions. Eric He, LBank’s Community Angel Officer, and Risk Control Adviser emphasized the importance of proactive risk management to avoid OM-style collapses.
“First, diversification is key—spreading capital across projects limits single-token exposure. Stop-loss triggers (e.g., 10-20% below buy price) can automate damage control in volatile conditions,” Eric shared with BeInCrypto.
Ming Wu had a similar perspective, emphasizing the importance of avoiding over-allocation to a single token. The executive explained that a diversified investment strategy helps mitigate risk and enhances overall portfolio stability.
“Investors can use perpetual futures as a risk management tool to hedge against potential price declines in their holdings,” Wu remarked.
Meanwhile, Phil Fogel advised focusing on a token’s liquidity. Key factors include the float size, price sensitivity to sell orders, and who can significantly impact the market.
3. Project Fundamentals
Experts also highlighted major discrepancies in MANTRA’s TVL. Eric He pointed out a significant gap between the token’s fully diluted valuation (FDV) and the TVL. OM’s FDV reached $9.5 billion, while its TVL was only $13 million, indicating a potential overvaluation.
“A $9.5 billion valuation against $13 million TVL, screamed instability,” Forest Bai, co-founder of Foresight Ventures, stated.
Notably, several issues were also raised regarding the airdrop. Jean Rausis called the airdrop a “mess.” He cited many issues, including delays, frequent changes to eligibility rules, and the disqualification of half the participants. Meanwhile, suspected bots were not removed.
“The airdrop disproportionately favored insiders while excluding genuine supporters, reflecting a lack of fairness,” Phil Fogel reiterated.
The criticism expanded further as Fogel pointed out the team’s alleged associations with questionable entities and ties to questionable initial coin offerings (ICOs), raising doubts about the project’s credibility. Eric He also suggested that MANTRA was allegedly tied to gambling platforms in the past.
Strategies to Protect Yourself
Forest Bai underscored the importance of verifying the project team’s credentials, reviewing the project roadmap, and monitoring on-chain activity to ensure transparency. He also advised investors to assess community engagement and regulatory compliance to gauge the project’s long-term viability.
Ming Wu also stressed distinguishing between real growth and artificially inflated metrics.
“It’s important to differentiate real growth from activity that’s artificially inflated through incentives or airdrops, unsustainable tactics like ‘selling a dollar for 90 cents’ may generate short-term metrics but don’t reflect actual engagement,” Wu informed BeInCrypto.
Finally, Wu recommended researching the background of the project’s team members to uncover any history of fraudulent activity or involvement in questionable ventures. This would ensure that investors are well-informed before committing to any project.
4. Whale Movements
As BeInCrypto reported earlier, before the crash, a whale wallet reportedly associated with the MANTRA team deposited 3.9 million OM tokens into the OKX exchange. Experts highlighted that this wasn’t an isolated incident.
“Large OM transfers (43.6 million tokens, ~$227 million) to exchanges days prior were a major warning of potential sell-offs,” Forest Bai conveyed to BeInCrypto.
Ming Wu also explained that investors should pay close attention to such large transfers, which often act as warning signals. Moreover, analysts at CryptoQuant also outlined what investors should look out for.
“OM transfers into exchanges amounted to as much as $35 million in just an hour. This represented an alert sign as: Transfers into exchanges are below $8 million in a typical hour (excluding transfers into Binance, which are typically large given the size of the exchange). Transfers into exchanges represented more than a third of the total OM transferred, which indicates a high transfer volume into exchanges,” CryptoQuant informed BeInCrypto.
Strategies to Protect Yourself
CryptoQuant stated that investors need to monitor the flows of any token into exchanges, as it could indicate increasing price volatility in the near future.
Meanwhile, Risk Control Adviser Eric He outlined four strategies to stay up-to-date when it comes to large transfers.
Chain Sleuthing: Tools like Arkham and Nansen allow investors to track large transfers and monitor wallet activity.
Set Alerts: Platforms like Etherscan and Glassnode notify investors of unusual market movements.
Track Exchange Flows: Users need to track large flows into centralized exchanges.
Check Lockups: Dune Analytics helps investors determine if team tokens are being released earlier than expected.
He also recommended focusing on the market structure.
“OM’s crash proved market depth is non-negotiable: Kaiko data showed 1% order book depth collapsed 74% before the fall. Always check liquidity metrics on platforms like Kaiko; if 1% depth is below $500,000, that’s a red flag,” Eric revealed to BeInCrypto.
Additionally, Phil Fogel underlined the importance of monitoring platforms like X (formerly Twitter) for any rumors or discussions about possible dumps. He stressed the need to analyze liquidity to assess whether a token can handle sell pressure without causing a significant price drop.
Interestingly, experts were slightly divided on how CEXs contributed to OM’s crash. Forest Bai claimed that CEX liquidations during low-liquidity hours worsened the crash by triggering cascading sell-offs. Eric He corroborated this sentiment.
“CEX liquidations played a major role in the OM crash, acting as an accelerant. With thin liquidity—1% depth falling from $600,000 to $147,000—forced closures triggered cascading liquidations. Over $74.7 million was wiped in 24 hours,” he mentioned.
“Analyzing the open interest in the OM derivatives market reveals that it was less than 0.1% of OM’s market capitalization. However, what’s particularly interesting is that during the market collapse, open interest in OM derivatives actually increased by 90%,” Wu expressed to BeInCrypto.
According to the executive, this challenges the idea that liquidations or forced closures caused the price drop. Instead, it indicates that traders and investors increased their short positions as the price fell.
Strategies to Protect Yourself
While the involvement of CEXs remains debatable, the experts did address the key point of investor protection.
“Investors can limit leverage to avoid forced liquidations, choose platforms with transparent risk policies, monitor open interest for liquidation risks, and hold tokens in self-custody wallets to reduce CEX exposure,” Forest Bai recommended.
Eric He also advised that investors should mitigate risks by adjusting leverage dynamically based on volatility. If tools like ATR or Bollinger Bands signal turbulence, exposure should be reduced.
The MANTRA (OM) collapse is a powerful reminder of the importance of due diligence and risk management in cryptocurrency investments. Investors can minimize the risk of falling into similar traps by carefully assessing tokenomics, monitoring on-chain data, and diversifying investments.
With expert insights, these strategies will help guide investors toward smarter, more secure decisions in the crypto market.
PumpFun has transferred 95,934 SOL, worth approximately $13.34 million, to Kraken, further adding to the total 1,818,889 SOL moved to the exchange in 2025, equating to around $324.06 million.
This move marks a continued trend of significant activity surrounding Solana (SOL), reflecting growing investor interest. As SOL consolidates its price following recent bullish trends, this development raises questions about the potential direction of the cryptocurrency.
PumpFun Whale Activity and SOL’s Recent Performance
According to blockchain data provider Lookonchain, PumpFun’s recent deposit adds to a growing list of whale activities. So far, in 2025, the total SOL moved to Kraken by PumpFun alone exceeds 1.8 million, highlighting a considerable volume of transactions. Solana’s price has shown notable strength, especially in light of recent whale movements, which tend to indicate investor confidence.
Solana’s price has recently cleared significant resistance levels, with many analysts suggesting the cryptocurrency is in a strong upward trend. A crypto analyst, Ted, has pointed out that the SOL price is showing bullish signs similar to the Q4 of 2022.
Ted suggests that SOL could see price levels between $160 to $180 by May 2025, with the potential for an all-time high later in the year. As whale activity continues, these predictions may influence market sentiment further.
Institutional Interest in Solana Surges
Institutional players’ participation is another factor that gives optimism to the SOL’s bullish run. Another player in the game is Galaxy Digital, though it has recently started making major withdrawals, pulling out about $77m worth of SOL from exchanges starting mid-April.
This also involved a substantial $19.5 million sell-off from Binance, showing faith in Solana’s potential. Other market players, such as Janover, also bought over $10m worth of Solana, validating the optimistic forecast for SOL price.
Such actions from institutional investors are usually viewed in the market as strong signs of confidence. Based on Galaxy Digital’s withdrawal, it could be estimated that large investors are preparing for higher SOL gains, which underlines the upbeat sentiment in Solana price. This increase in institutional support could enhance the overall market sentiment and help SOL rise in the short run.
Growing Number of Large Solana Holders
In addition to institutional interest like PumpFun’s, large retail investors are also becoming more active in Solana. Analyst Ali Martinez reported that the number of wallets holding 10,000 or more SOL increased by 1.53% in the past week.
This uptick, which grew from 4,943 wallets to 5,019, suggests that bigger holders are accumulating more Solana quietly. Such accumulation often occurs before broader market recognition, which can lead to price rallies.
This pattern of increasing wallet activity from significant holders further points to confidence in Solana’s potential. If these large investors continue to increase their positions, the demand for SOL could continue to rise, creating upward pressure on its price. The accumulation could be a sign that some are positioning themselves ahead of a potential breakout in price.
SOL Technical Analysis and Price Forecasts
The recent movement in Solana price has caught traders’ attention, with some analysts forecasting a continued rise. Another crypto analyst, Learnernoearner, suggested that an inverse head and shoulders pattern may be forming, indicating a potential long-entry opportunity.
If Solana price experiences a brief pullback, this could provide an attractive entry point for traders.
Key technical levels for SOL price include support at $125, immediate resistance at $135, and a breakout zone at $178. If SOL price breaches the $178 mark, further targets could include $199, $216, and $238, and some even suggest a rally to $2000.
