Most of the altcoins are trying hard to make a strong comeback after the latest pullback from their respective local highs. Meanwhile, the Dogecoin price continues to maintain a strong descending trend after the rejection from the local resistance zone close to $0.2. While Bitcoin & Ethereum prices are closely consolidating within a narrow range, aiming to trigger a rebound above the bearish range, DOGE price seems to be losing its grip over the rally. The token is about to erase the gains incurred in the past 30 days, which hints towards the resurgence of a fresh bearish trend.
This raises concerns about whether Dogecoin has a future. Will the cost of 1 Dogecoin reach $0.5 in 2025?
The DOGE price is maintaining a horizontal trade without displaying any strong possibility of a trend reversal. As a result, enough liquidity is accumulated on either side, which suggests the token has entered a decisive phase.
The DOGE price has triggered a rebound before reaching the liquidating zone around $0.164, where the liquidation leverage has surpassed $500 million. Therefore, to reclaim the higher levels, the price is required to liquidate the leverage within this range by plunging below the range. This could squeeze out all the shorts, enabling a significant rebound and a continued upswing. Still, the question remains: Will this help the DOGE price reach $0.2?
The short-term price action of DOGE suggests the price is experiencing tremendous upward pressure after failing to hold above the ascending trend line. The conversion line of the Ichimoku cloud is acting as a strong resistance, without displaying any chance of a bullish crossover. On the other hand, the Stochastic RSI faced a pullback after testing the average range, hinting at the growing dominance of the bears.
Therefore, the Dogecoin (DOGE) price is expected to test the local support at $0.162, which is below the liquidation level at $0.164. This move is expected to cause a short liquidation and trigger a strong upswing towards higher targets, probably at $0.18 initially and later at $0.2.
After examining the major centralized exchange tokens like BNB, OKB, CRO, and others, MultiBank’s MBG token emerges as a particularly compelling opportunity that combines institutional credibility with innovative tokenomics. Here’s an in-depth analysis of why MBG stands out in the current market landscape.
I. Tokenomics: Strategic Scarcity by Design
MBG’s tokenomics structure appears more aggressive in its deflationary approach than most established CEX tokens:
Buyback & Burn Mechanism: Up to 50% of the token supply is designated for buyback and burn, directly tied to trading volume across the MultiBank ecosystem. This significantly outpaces BNB’s burn rate (which aims to eventually burn 50% of initial supply to reach 100M tokens) and exceeds MEXC’s 40% profit allocation for burns.
Volume-Based Burns: By linking burns directly to trading activity rather than just quarterly profits, MBG creates a more immediate and transparent relationship between platform success and token value.
This aggressive deflationary model could accelerate scarcity, potentially driving price appreciation more rapidly than competitors if trading volume meets expectations.
II. Utility: Multi-Dimensional Value Creation
MBG integrates multiple utility functions that have proven successful across other CEX tokens:
Trading Fee Discounts: Similar to BNB and OKB, incentivizing platform usage
Staking Rewards: Creating passive income opportunities for holders
Exclusive IEO Access: Following the successful model of Binance Launchpad and MEXC Kickstarter
Social Trading Boosts: A unique feature that differentiates it from other CEX tokens
What’s notable is how MBG has integrated the most successful utility elements from various exchanges while adding unique features that align with modern trading behaviors like social trading.
III. Institutional Credibility: The TradFi Advantage
This is where MBG truly distinguishes itself from most CEX tokens:
Established Financial Infrastructure: Backed by MultiBank Group with $4.5 trillion traded in 2024
17 Regulatory Licenses: Spanning five continents, demonstrating global compliance
Two Decades of Financial Operations: Unlike many crypto projects with limited operational history
Multiple Exchange Licenses: VARA, AUSTRAC, and FSAS regulated
While tokens like BNB have faced ongoing regulatory scrutiny and uncertainty, MBG begins with established regulatory compliance, potentially offering greater stability and institutional confidence.
IV. Market Positioning: The RWA Bridge
MBG is strategically positioned at the intersection of two powerful trends:
CEX Token Utility: Leveraging the proven business model of exchange tokens
Real World Asset (RWA) Integration: Connecting to traditional finance at a time when the market is increasingly focused on bridging TradFi and DeFi
This dual positioning is unique among CEX tokens, most of which lack the regulatory framework and TradFi connections to meaningfully participate in the RWA narrative.
V. Growth Potential: Early-Stage Opportunity
Unlike established CEX tokens with mature valuations, MBG represents an early-stage opportunity:
Market Cap Differential: Compared to BNB’s $85+ billion market cap, MBG has substantial room for growth if it captures even a fraction of that value
Expanding User Base: As MultiBank transitions its existing TradFi clients to its crypto exchange
Cross-Selling Potential: Ability to market to both crypto natives and traditional finance participants
VI. Comparative Advantage Analysis
When compared directly to leading CEX tokens, MBG offers several distinct advantages:
For investors seeking exposure to the CEX token sector, MBG offers a unique value proposition that merges institutional credibility with crypto innovation at an early stage of development. The combination of established TradFi infrastructure, aggressive tokenomics, and comprehensive utility creates a potentially powerful value proposition in the current market environment.
The post MultiBank (MBG) Token Analysis: A Standout Opportunity in the CEX Token Landscape appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News
After examining the major centralized exchange tokens like BNB, OKB, CRO, and others, MultiBank’s MBG token emerges as a particularly compelling opportunity that combines institutional credibility with innovative tokenomics. Here’s an in-depth analysis of why MBG stands out in the current market landscape. I. Tokenomics: Strategic Scarcity by Design MBG’s tokenomics structure appears more aggressive …
Solana has emerged as a powerful presence in the crypto industry. Since its inception in 2020, the network has dominated the market, demonstrating remarkable levels of user engagement and practical utility, particularly in decentralized finance (DeFi). Many in the industry view it as the next natural contender to receive an ETF approval in the United States.
However, others are more cautious in their evaluations. BeInCrypto spoke with representatives from Gravity, Variant, and OKX to understand the areas where Solana is still lacking. Industry leaders referred to centralization, network reliability, and excessive regulation as points of contention for Solana’s ETF approval.
Bitcoin and Ethereum’s Precedent
The availability of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) for prominent cryptocurrencies has grown over the past year. These funds offer investors diversified investment opportunities and act as a bridge between traditional finance and the increasingly mainstream cryptocurrency market.
Meanwhile, the deadline for some filings, including Grayscale’s, was extended until October. Nonetheless, posts on X and some analytical reports suggest yesterday’s deadline as a date of interest for an initial or consolidated SEC response to several applications.
2025 Predictions and Market Expectations
The tentative approval of a Solana ETF has generated much debate across social media platforms. ETF President Nate Geraci formally predicted that 2025 would be the year of crypto ETFs and that Solana would receive its approval this year.
Per previous reports, former Trump White House Secretary Anthony Scaramucci expressed that, with a Trump reelection, Solana ETFs could gain approval during Q1 of 2025. According to his predictions, Solana would receive the SEC’s green light during the next two weeks.
Meanwhile, the prediction market Polymarket estimates an 82% chance that a Solana ETF will get approved in 2025.
According to a Polymarket poll, Solana has an 82% chance of getting an ETF approval in 2025. Source: Polymarket
Several factors make an imminent Solana ETF approval seem plausible. Less than five years after the network launched, Solana quickly became a major player in the crypto industry, attracting users for its high transaction speeds and low gas fees.
“From a network perspective, Solana’s performance has been remarkable, now driving nearly 50% of all global DEX volume– a dominance that fundamentally reshapes the DeFi landscape. The blockchain is not just handling unprecedented transaction volumes… it’s transforming our understanding of blockchain scalability at scale,” Lennix Lai, Global Chief Commercial Officer at OKX told BeInCrypto.
Solana has established itself as a dynamic force in the crypto industry following a successful 2024.
A Messari report detailed particular growth in Solana’s final quarter across DeFi, liquid staking, NFTs, and institutional involvement. The total value locked (TVL) in Solana’s DeFi sector increased substantially, growing by 64% to $8.6 billion, which placed it behind Ethereum as the second-largest network based on TVL.
Solana’s positive performance, coupled with Donald Trump’s reelection to the US presidency, further amplified the crypto industry’s optimism over an ETF approval.
However, some industry experts have expressed more tempered expectations.
Experts Offer Tempered Expectations
A few days before Trump assumed the presidency, Bloomberg Intelligence analyst James Seyffart said Solana ETFs may not be launched in the US until 2026. He cited the SEC’s precedent of taking a lot of time to review filings as the cause for delay.
In another post, Bloomberg Senior ETF analyst Eric Balchunas said that ETF approvals for other cryptocurrencies were more likely to occur before Solana.
“We expect a wave of cryptocurrency ETFs next year, albeit not all at once. First out is likely the BTC + ETH combo ETFs, then prob Litecoin (bc its fork of btc = commodity), then HBAR (bc not labeled security) and then XRP/Solana (which have been labeled securities in pending lawsuits),” Balchunas said.
Balchunas further explained that complex legal issues around Solana, relating to its status as a security, need to be resolved before it can gain ETF approval. Consequently, he deemed the approval of Litecoin or Hedera ETFs more likely.
Uncertainty over whether Solana classifies as a security is a major driver fueling doubts over its ETF approval.
Security Classification Concerns
Martins Benkitis, co-founder and CEO of Gravity, explained that Solana’s regulatory classification complicates its path to approval.
“It’s no secret there’s currently a lack of precedent for Layer-1 blockchains beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum in the ETF space, this suggests cautious optimism but with higher regulatory hurdles. Bitcoin, being a commodity in the SEC’s eyes, and Ethereum’s gradual transition to PoS had different legal considerations. Solana, on the other hand, faces concerns over potential classification as a security due to its token distribution and foundation’s involvement,” Benkitis told BeInCrypto.
The SEC identified Solana as a security in lawsuits against Binance and Coinbase over the past two years, although these lawsuits have since been dropped. The SEC argued that these tokens could be considered investment contracts under the Howey Test.
While some interpreted the SEC’s lawsuit withdrawal as a softening stance on Solana’s security classification, others quickly challenged this assumption.
“There is no reason to think [the] SEC has decided SOL is a non-security. That they don’t want to do discovery on a dozen tokens in the Binance case appears to be a litigation tactic, not a change in policy,” said Jake Chervinsky, Chief Legal Officer at Variant, following the Binance lawsuit withdrawal in July 2024.
Others believe that a pro-crypto administration should be enough to influence the SEC to consider Solana as a non-security. Lai disagrees.
“The changing political landscape, particularly with Trump’s victory and pro-crypto stance, could create a more constructive environment for innovative blockchain platforms like Solana. However, the technical and market structure considerations will remain crucial regardless of administration changes,” he said.
In the meantime, there are several other requirements Solana must meet.
On his part, Lai added other aspects to the list of considerations.
“While Polymarket shows high odds for 2025 approval, several critical factors suggest a more complex pathway: Solana’s technological architecture presents unique challenges with its PoS mechanism; The absence of CME futures raises liquidity and risk management concerns; Historical network downtime incidents need addressing; Centralization questions relative to BTC and ETH remain unresolved; Institutional interest hasn’t matched BTC and ETH levels despite the network driving 48% of global DEX volume; [and] the temporary nature of trending themes suggests caution in using current volumes as primary indicators,” Lai told BeInCrypto.
Concerns about centralization and scalability have long been discussed regarding Solana, even outside of discussions over an ETF approval.
Since 2021, Solana has suffered over a dozen network outages varying in severity. These outages have jeopardized the network’s reputation as stable and reliable– two strongly considered characteristics during the ETF approval process.
“From a market making standpoint, network reliability is crucial as any downtime or congestion can significantly impact trading operations and order execution,” Benkitis affirmed.
However, Solana has successfully curbed the number of outages it has experienced. Once notorious for the frequency of its shutdowns, the last time Solana experienced one was in February 2024.
Meanwhile, developers designed Solana’s upcoming Firedancer validator client to improve network stability and transaction processing. Its distinct codebase offers greater resilience against widespread outages and will enhance Solana’s performance.
Yet, Solana must also mitigate centralization concerns to improve its chances of obtaining ETF approval.
Centralization Concerns
Solana’s validator node requirements, which demand significant hardware investments, can create barriers to entry. These obstacles can potentially concentrate power within the network among those capable of affording the necessary infrastructure.
In turn, the protocol’s limited number of validators compared to other networks raises concerns over centralization. For context, while Solana currently has around 2,000 active validators, Ethereum passed the one million benchmark last year—the largest number recorded by any blockchain network.
Though Solana’s hardware reliance speeds up the network, it also raises decentralization concerns. Benkitis factored this aspect into his evaluation of an ETF approval.
Its currently underdeveloped futures market infrastructure further complicates Solana’s viability as an ETF candidate.
Its filings were unprecedented because the network did not have a previously established futures market. This factor was crucial in determining an ETF approval for Bitcoin and Ethereum.
“The lack of CME futures and institutional frameworks comparable to BTC/ETH could influence [the SEC’s] evaluation,” Lai said.
He added that the proliferation of meme tokens minted on Solana could present themselves as a potential roadblock.
“Market reactions reflect Solana’s emergence as the primary driver of this cycle, with DEX volumes exceeding $100 billion and dominating major aggregators. However, I believe the temporary nature of trending themes suggests continued volatility. While technological advancement and growing institutional adoption may provide stronger foundations, we need to maintain perspective on the cyclical nature of crypto trends,” Lai said.
This more recent development in Solana’s attraction also brings its set of downsides.
Meme Coin Influence and Regulatory Concerns
The expanding meme coin market on Solana partially explains its popularity. Platforms like Pump.fun allow anyone to launch their tokens, and this design has even led to celebrities launching their tokens on the platform.
More recently, political figures like Donald Trump and Argentine president Javier Milei have also launched meme tokens on Solana platforms. Yet, these activities have proven to be high-risk. In many cases, meme coin investments have caused smaller retailers millions of dollars in losses.
Benkitis said that the SEC might frown upon the speculative nature of these trading activities.
“While an ETF approval could unlock liquidity opportunities, the market’s heavy dependence on speculative sentiment calls for a measured and cautious approach,” he said.
With so many considerations, approving a Solana ETF in 2025 is far from guaranteed. The SEC’s eventual decision will be a defining moment for the network and the broader crypto industry.
South Korea has pushed Google to restrict access to 17 foreign trading platforms, including KuCoin and MEXC.
The crackdown, which took effect on March 25, is part of the country’s ongoing efforts to regulate the crypto industry and safeguard local investors.
Here’s Why the South Korean Government Took Action
South Korea’s top financial regulator, the Financial Services Commission (FSC), confirmed that Google Play had removed KuCoin and MEXC, among 15 other exchanges, from its platform. The move makes it impossible for new users to install the apps.
“Since March 25, at the request of the South Korean government, Google has implemented domestic access restrictions on 17 exchanges that are not registered in South Korea. Users cannot install new related applications or update them, including KuCoin, MEXC, Phemex, XT, Biture, CoinW, CoinEX, ZoomEX, Poloniex, BTCC, DigiFinex, Pionex, Blofin, Apex Pro, CoinCatch, WEEX, and BitMart,” Wu Blockchain reported.
Existing users are also unable to update them, further limiting their accessibility. According to the FSC, these platforms failed to register under South Korean law while actively targeting local traders. With this, they effectively violated the country’s regulatory requirements.
South Korea has some of the world’s strictest crypto regulations, and authorities have been increasingly aggressive in enforcing them. Under the Specific Financial Transaction Information Reporting and Use Act, any foreign virtual asset service provider (VASP) operating in South Korea must register with the country’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU).
The FSC emphasized that this latest measure aims to prevent financial crimes such as money laundering and protect investors from potential fraud. The regulator outlined the criteria to determine whether an exchange was operating illegally in the country.
These included offering a Korean-language website, actively marketing to local users, and supporting transactions in Korean won.
While this enforcement action is significant, it is not the first time South Korean authorities have taken a hard stance against foreign exchanges. In 2022, the FIU identified and restricted 16 unregistered platforms, followed by another six in 2023.
The latest crackdown signals regulators are doubling their efforts to bring the crypto market under stricter oversight.
Upbit Exchange To Grow Market Edge
With major international exchanges facing restrictions, the dominance of local platforms like Upbit has only strengthened. The exchange controls a significant share of South Korea’s crypto trading market.
BeInCrypto recently reported that over 30% of South Korea’s population trades cryptocurrency. Upbit processes the bulk of these transactions. This latest move against foreign exchanges could further consolidate Upbit’s position in the market, making it the go-to platform for retail and institutional investors.
“South Korea isn’t playing when it comes to crypto regulations. This move [blacklisting 17 exchanges] puts a real hurdle in front of traders using these exchanges,” one user remarked.
Upbit Dominates South Korean exchanges in Trading volume. Source: CoinGecko
By enforcing compliance measures and weeding out unregistered players, the government is creating a more structured environment that may attract traditional financial (TradFi) institutions looking for regulatory clarity before investing in digital assets.
The country has also been taking steps to delay taxation on crypto investments, which signals a more balanced approach that seeks to encourage growth in the sector while ensuring investor protection.
