A seasoned crypto expert, renowned for turning a remarkable profit on PEPE, now points to the next coin with explosive potential. This intriguing project, codename: Pepe crypto, sets itself apart as a stark contrast to the pretenders in the market.
With the crypto market witnessing a flourishing period, readers are eager to uncover the opportunities Codename: Pepe crypto presents. This coin promises a unique blend of humor and high returns, making it one to watch closely.
Codename:Pepe Unleashes True Intelligence for Maximum Profits
The crypto underworld is infested with fake AI agents—shady operators promising “next-gen intelligence” while barely outsmarting a toaster. This nonsense ends today.
Codename:Pepe has come to denounce fake AI agents. This ultimate undercover agent does not pretend, it is actually doing something useful: helping you make money in the chaotic meme coin jungle. Codename:Pepe is on a mission of mass hilarity (and, naturally, ridiculous gains).
Classified Intel: The True Identity of Codename:Pepe
Keep this under wraps: Codename:Pepe is a Pepe in disguise. Modeled after the legendary PEPE coin, which skyrocketed nearly 22,000%, this covert operative has the same ambition. Will it succeed? That depends on its community.
Unlike VC-backed rug pulls, Codename:Pepe is powered by the people. The bigger the support, the higher it moonwalks. That’s why it has chosen the community-driven presale strategy with a smart plan:
Entry Price at Stage One: $0.003333333 (because three is a lucky number)
Final Stage Price: $0.151515152 (because round numbers are boring)
Codename:Pepe plans to use the power of artificial intelligence to hunt down the juiciest meme coins, predict market trends, and deliver exclusive AI-powered trading signals before the FOMO kicks in.
Beyond smart analysis, this genius agent will also trade for you with its fully automated AI-trader, turning those signals into sweet gains.
Every great agent needs an elite organization backing them. That’s where $AGNT comes in. Holding $AGNT unlocks membership in a top-secret DAO, where operatives (investors) gain access to classified strategies, insider analytics, and the ability to vote on high-stakes missions. Holding $AGNT will unlock:
Membership in a top-secret DAO
Access to classified strategies
Insider analytics
Ability to vote on high-stakes missions
Profits from the mutual DAO fund will be allocated to those who stake their $AGNT, ensuring the spoils of the trade go to the most loyal agents.
Top-Secret Tokenomics (No Funny Business)
This is a community-first operation, so 25% the total token supply is allocated for staking and rewards.
Codename:Pepe isn’t just throwing tokens around like confetti. The supply is capped at 5 billion, ensuring no surprise inflation bombs.
Further breaking down the tokemonics, only 20% of the supply is allocated for the presale. The offer at a discounted price is limited.
Final Orders: Deploy Capital & Secure Your $AGNT Now
This is your shot to join crypto’s most ridiculous yet lucrative mission. The best entries go to the fastest trigger fingers. Don’t be the guy who “wished he got in early.”
The mission is set. The presale is live. Are you in, or will you let the AI fakes win?
Pepe is a cryptocurrency inspired by the viral meme of Pepe the Frog, created by Matt Furie in the early 2000s. This digital currency is a meme coin using Ethereum’s ERC-20 standard. It’s designed to be simple and transparent, with a strong community focus. The project’s development is divided into three phases: Meme, Vibe and HODL, and Meme Takeover. Pepe does not aim for lofty promises but instead keeps things fun and straightforward, staying true to its meme origins.
Currently, Pepe is one of the top meme coins, with significant competition from Dogecoin and Shiba Inu. Its market position is notable, ranking within the top 30 cryptocurrencies by market capitalization. However, its price can be volatile. Predictions vary widely regarding its future value, with some analysts suggesting potential growth while others anticipate challenges. Pepe’s market performance depends largely on continued community engagement and general market trends.
Conclusion
With the bull run in full swing, coins like PEPE may offer limited potential in the short term. Codename:Pepe crypto, however, stands out by unleashing true intelligence to maximize profits.
By employing advanced AI for market analysis and automated trading, Codename:Pepe crypto helps investors navigate the meme coin market. Its community-focused approach and capped supply make it a promising option. Early participation could secure a significant advantage in this innovative project.
The metrics used to measure outcomes can be misleading when evaluating blockchain performance. As more blockchain networks emerge, the public needs clear, efficiency-focused metrics, rather than exaggerated claims, to differentiate between them.
In a conversation with BeInCrypto, Taraxa Co-Founder Steven Pu explained that it’s becoming increasingly difficult to compare blockchain performance accurately because many reported metrics rely on overly optimistic assumptions rather than evidence-based results. To combat this wave of misrepresentation, Pu proposes a new metric, which he calls TPS/$.
Why Does the Industry Lack Reliable Benchmarks?
The need for clear differentiation is growing with the increasing number of Layer-1 blockchain networks. As various developers promote the speed and efficiency of their blockchains, relying on metrics that distinguish their performance becomes indispensable.
However, the industry still lacks reliable benchmarks for real-world efficiency, instead relying on sporadic sentimental waves of hype-driven popularity. According to Pu, misleading performance figures currently saturate the market, obscuring true capabilities.
“It’s easy for opportunists to take advantage by driving up over-simplified and exaggerated narratives to profit themselves. Every single conceivable technical concept and metric has at one time or another been used to hype up many projects that don’t really deserve them: TPS, finality latency, modularity, network node count, execution speed, parallelization, bandwidth utilization, EVM-compatibility, EVM-incompatibility, etc.,” Pu told BeInCrypto.
Pu focused on how some projects exploit TPS metrics, using them as marketing tactics to make blockchain performance sound more appealing than it might be under real-world conditions.
Examining the Misleading Nature of TPS
Transactions per second, more commonly known as TPS, is a metric that refers to the average or sustained number of transactions that a blockchain network can process and finalize per second under normal operating conditions.
However, it often misleadingly hypes projects, offering a skewed view of overall performance.
“Decentralized networks are complex systems that need to be considered as a whole, and in the context of their use cases. But the market has this horrible habit of over-simplifying and over-selling one specific metric or aspect of a project, while ignoring the whole. Perhaps a highly centralized, high-TPS network does have its uses in the right scenarios with specific trust models, but the market really has no appetite for such nuanced descriptions,” Pu explained.
Pu indicates that blockchain projects with extreme claims on single metrics like TPS may have compromised decentralization, security, and accuracy.
“Take TPS, for example. This one metric masks numerous other aspects of the network, for example, how was the TPS achieved? What was sacrificed in the process? If I have 1 node, running a WASM JIT VM, call that a network, that gets you a few hundred thousand TPS right off the bat. I then make 1000 copies of that machine and call it sharding, now you start to get into the hundreds of millions of ‘TPS’. Add in unrealistic assumptions such as non-conflict, and you assume you can parallelize all transactions, then you can get “TPS” into the billions. It’s not that TPS is a bad metric, you just can’t look at any metric in isolation because there’s so much hidden information behind the numbers,” he added.
The Taraxa Co-founder revealed the extent of these inflated metrics in a recent report.
The Significant Discrepancy Between Theoretical and Real-World TPS
Pu sought to prove his point by determining the difference between the maximum historical TPS realized on a blockchain’s mainnet and the maximum theoretical TPS.
Of the 22 permissionless and single-shard networks observed, Pu found that, on average, there was a 20-fold gap between theory and reality. In other words, the theoretical metric was 20 times higher than the maximum observed mainnet TPS.
Taraxa Co-founder finds 20x difference between the Theoretical TPS and the Max Observed Mainnet TPS. Source: Taraxa.
“Metric overestimations (such as in the case of TPS) are a response to the highly speculative and narrative-driven crypto market. Everyone wants to position their project and technologies in the best possible light, so they come up with theoretical estimates, or conduct tests with wildly unrealistic assumptions, to arrive at inflated metrics. It’s dishonest advertising. Nothing more, nothing less,” Pu told BeInCrypto.
Looking to counter these exaggerated metrics, Pu developed his own performance measure.
Introducing TPS/$: A More Balanced Metric?
Pu and his team developed the following: TPS realized on mainnet / monthly $ cost of a single validator node, or TPS/$ for short, to fulfill the need for better performance metrics.
This metric assesses performance based on verifiable TPS achieved on a network’s live mainnet while also considering hardware efficiency.
The significant 20-fold gap between theoretical and actual throughput convinced Pu to exclude metrics based solely on assumptions or lab conditions. He also aimed to illustrate how some blockchain projects inflate performance metrics by relying on costly infrastructure.
“Published network performance claims are often inflated by extremely expensive hardware. This is especially true for networks with highly centralized consensus mechanisms, where the throughput bottleneck shifts away from networking latency and into single-machine hardware performance. Requiring extremely expensive hardware for validators not only betrays a centralized consensus algorithm and inefficient engineering, it also prevents the vast majority of the world from potentially participating in consensus by pricing them out,” Pu explained.
Pu’s team located each network’s minimum validator hardware requirements to determine the cost per validator node. They later estimated their monthly cost, paying particular attention to their relative sizing when used to compute the TPS per dollar ratios.
“So the TPS/$ metric tries to correct two of the perhaps most egregious categories of misinformation, by forcing the TPS performance to be on mainnet, and revealing the inherent tradeoffs of extremely expensive hardware,” Pu added.
Pu stressed considering two simple, identifiable characteristics: whether a network is permissionless and single-sharded.
Permissioned vs. Permissionless Networks: Which Fosters Decentralization?
A blockchain’s degree of security can be unveiled by whether it operates under a permissioned or permissionless network.
Permissioned blockchains refer to closed networks where access and participation are restricted to a predefined group of users, requiring permission from a central authority or trusted group to join. In permissionless blockchains, anyone is allowed to participate.
According to Pu, the former model is at odds with the philosophy of decentralization.
“A permissioned network, where network validation membership is controlled by a single entity, or if there is just a single entity (every Layer-2s), is another excellent metric. This tells you whether or not the network is indeed decentralized. A hallmark of decentralization is its ability to bridge trust gaps. Take decentralization away, then the network is nothing more than a cloud service,” Pu told BeInCrypto.
Attention to these metrics will prove vital over time, as networks with centralized authorities tend to be more vulnerable to certain weaknesses.
“In the long term, what we really need is a battery of standardized attack vectors for L1 infrastructure that can help to reveal weaknesses and tradeoffs for any given architectural design. Much of the problems in today’s mainstream L1 are that they make unreasonable sacrifices in security and decentralization. These characteristics are invisible and extremely hard to observe, until a disaster strikes. My hope is that as the industry matures, such a battery of tests will begin to organically emerge into an industry-wide standard,” Pu added.
Meanwhile, understanding whether a network employs state-sharding versus maintaining a single, sharded state reveals how unified its data management is.
State-Sharding vs. Single-State: Understanding Data Unity
In blockchain performance, latency refers to the time delay between submitting a transaction to the network, confirming it, and including it in a block on the blockchain. It measures how long it takes for a transaction to be processed and become a permanent part of the distributed ledger.
Identifying whether a network employs state-sharding or a single-sharded state can reveal much about its latency efficiency.
State-sharded networks divide the blockchain’s data into multiple independent parts called shards. Each shard operates somewhat independently and doesn’t have direct, real-time access to the complete state of the entire network.
By contrast, a non-state-sharded network has a single, shared state across the entire network. All nodes can access and process the same complete data set in this case.
Pu noted that state-sharded networks aim to increase storage and transaction capacity. However, they often face longer finality latencies due to a need to process transactions across multiple independent shards.
He added that many projects adopting a sharding approach inflate throughput by simply replicating their network rather than building a truly integrated and scalable architecture.
“A state-sharded network that doesn’t share state, is simply making unconnected copies of a network. If I take a L1 network and just make 1000 copies of it running independently, it’s clearly dishonest to claim that I can add up all the throughput across the copies together and represent it as a single network. There are architectures that actually synchronize the states as well as shuffle the validators across shards, but more often than not, projects making outlandish claims on throughput are just making independent copies,” Pu said.
Based on his research into the efficiency of blockchain metrics, Pu highlighted the need for fundamental shifts in how projects are evaluated, funded, and ultimately succeed.
What Fundamental Shifts Does Blockchain Evaluation Need?
Pu’s insights present a notable alternative in a Layer-1 blockchain space where misleading performance metrics increasingly compete for attention. Reliable and effective benchmarks are essential to counter these false representations.
“You only know what you can measure, and right now in crypto, the numbers look more like hype-narratives than objective measurements. Having standardized, transparent measurements allows simple comparisons across product options so developers and users understand what it is they’re using, and what tradeoffs they’re making. This is a hallmark of any mature industry, and we still have a long way to go in crypto,” Pu concluded.
Adopting standardized and transparent benchmarks will foster informed decision-making and drive genuine progress beyond merely promotional claims as the industry matures.
In the last week of May, the cryptocurrency market experienced a slowdown in trading activity as participants took profits following recent rallies.
Despite this brief lull, several altcoins have caught the attention of large investors, commonly known as whales, who are accumulating positions in anticipation of potential price gains in June.
Dogecoin (DOGE)
The leading meme coin, DOGE, is among the assets crypto whales are accumulating for potential gains in June. This trend is reflected in the recent surge in DOGE accumulation among whale wallets holding between 1 million and 10 million tokens.
According to Santiment, this group of DOGE whales added 30 million tokens to their wallets over the past week.
Such buying activity by whales often serves as a strong signal to retail traders. Seeing large investors confidently increase their positions can encourage retail participation. This could drive up DOGE’s value as buying momentum builds across the market.
If buying pressure subsists, the token could resume its rally and climb to $0.206.
However, if whale accumulation stalls and selloffs strengthen, DOGE’s value could fall to $0.175.
Avalanche (AVAX)
Layer-1 (L1) coin AVAX is another asset crypto whales are holding for gains in June. This is reflected by the 474% uptick in the coin’s large holders’ netflow in the past seven days.
Large holders are whale addresses that hold more than 0.1% of an asset’s circulating supply. Their netflow tracks the difference between the coins they buy and the amount they sell over a specific period.
When an asset’s large holders’ netflow increases, more of its tokens are flowing into the wallets of these major investors than are flowing out. This trend indicates that AVAX whales are accumulating the asset, signaling confidence in its future value.
AVAX could witness a rebound and surge to $24.28 if whale accumulation continues.
On the other hand, the altcoin’s price could extend its decline to $14.66 if the whales begin to sell for profit.
Quant (QNT)
QNT has defied this week’s broader market downturn, posting 7% gains. The token’s near-10% rally appears to be fueled by renewed investor interest following the launch of Overledger Fusion, a Layer 2.5 network designed to bridge institutions, enterprises, and decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystems.
It has also driven a surge in whale accumulation, indicated by the 1083% rally in the token’s large holders’ netflow over the past week. This uptick signals growing confidence in QNT’s short-term performance and hints at the likelihood of further rallies as large investors increase their exposure.
Strategy missed Wall Street expectations by a huge margin during the first quarter.
Saylor expects the BTC price to record a compounded annual growth rate of about 30 percent in the next two decades.
Bitcoin price rebounded above $96k for the first time since mid-February.
Strategy, formerly MicroStrategy, the leading corporate holder of Bitcoin (BTC), released its first quarter 2025 financial results on Thursday, May 1. For the three-month period that ended on March 31, Strategy added 61,497 Bitcoins, thus currency holding about 553,555 Bitcoins.
As a result, Strategy achieved a BTC Yield of 13.7 percent in the first quarter of 2025.
The company continued to capitalize on the equity markets to purchase more Bitcoins during the first quarter.
“We successfully executed our record $21 billion common stock ATM, adding 301,335 BTC to our balance sheet while simultaneously achieving a 50% increase in MSTR share price during the same period. In Q1, we also broadened our capital base with two of the most successful preferred stock IPOs in a decade,” Phong Le, President and Chief Executive Officer at Strategy noted.
Market Outlook for Strategy
During the first quarter of 2025, Strategy recorded revenue of about $111.1 million, a decline of 3.6 percent year over year. The company reported a gross profit of $77.1 million in Q1 2025, compared to $85.2 million at the same time last year.
Analysts polled by FactSet anticipated Strategy to report a GAAP loss of 11 cents per share on sales of $117 million. Meanwhile, Strategy anticipates raising $84 billion in the coming quarters to purchase more Bitcoins.
$MSTR announces BTC Yield of 13.7% and BTC $ Gain of $5.8B year-to-date, doubles capital plan to $42B equity and $42B fixed income to purchase bitcoin, and increases BTC Yield target from 15% to 25% and BTC $ Gain target from $10B to $15B for 2025. https://t.co/LgeMEd6Dr5
The company’s long-term confidence in Bitcoin has helped attract more institutional investors in the industry. As a result, Bitcoin price has gained bullish sentiment akin to Gold. In the past two weeks, Bitcoin price gained over 13 percent to trade at about $96.6k at the time of this writing.
If BTC price manages to consistently close above $96k in the coming weeks, a rally beyond $109k will be inevitable.
The post Strategy Releases Q1 Financial Results: Michael Saylor Remains a Bitcoin Maximalist and Raises 2025 Targets appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News
Strategy missed Wall Street expectations by a huge margin during the first quarter. Saylor expects the BTC price to record a compounded annual growth rate of about 30 percent in the next two decades. Bitcoin price rebounded above $96k for the first time since mid-February. Strategy, formerly MicroStrategy, the leading corporate holder of Bitcoin (BTC), …