Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has proposed a five-year plan to simplify Ethereum’s base layer. Titled “Simplifying the L1,” the proposal aims to reduce complexity, lower development costs, and improve security. Inspired by Bitcoin’s clean and minimal design, Buterin suggests setting a cap on the number of code lines in Ethereum’s core protocol. This would help Ethereum become more resilient and easier to maintain over time, ensuring the network stays strong and efficient for the long run.
The European Central Bank (ECB) and European Commission are having a public dispute over MiCA and stablecoin regulation. The ECB believes that restrictions aren’t harsh enough, fearing US firms dominating the market.
The Commission disputed the ECB’s fears, alleging that it’s building up stablecoin-related fears to promote a controversial digital euro program. There are already signs of European irrelevance to Web3, and more restrictions likely wouldn’t help.
As one commentator, Mikko Ohtamaa, put it, it has good reasons to worry about the future:
“The EU had the first mover advantage with the regulation and they screwed it up. No EU stablecoin is internationally competitive because the inherited business unfriendliness that was baked into the MiCA by the lobbying efforts of banks and other legacy financial institutions,” he claimed via social media.
Most recently, Ethena Labs, too, pulled out of Europe after failing to get MiCA approval. These firms had no such problems in the US.
In an interesting twist, the ECB’s concern is not that MiCA is too harsh, thereby preventing innovation. As Politico claimed, it instead worries that existing regulations aren’t strong enough.
Instead, it acknowledged President Trump’s stated goal to use stablecoins to promote dollar dominance and fears that US assets could flood European markets. It wants to fight back head-on.
This is at the heart of the controversy between these EU institutions. The European Commission reacted with hostility to the ECB’s proposed MiCA changes.
That is, it seems that most EU institutions are satisfied with existing stablecoin regulations. Besides, if the ECB gets its proposed MiCA reforms, would that even matter?
The crypto markets reacted with shocking ambivalence to its recent rate cuts. Europe is in danger of falling behind in the global Web3 economy, and more restrictions aren’t likely to help.
The US DOJ just published a new directive claiming it will stop investigating and criminally charging crypto exchanges, mixers, and offline wallets.
This has produced a mixed response from the crypto community. Some sectors are jubilant about the potential freedom for business, while others fear the growing problem of fraud and criminal money laundering.
Today, the Department of Justice (DOJ) released a statement claiming it will no longer investigate crypto entities.
“The Justice Department will stop participating in regulation by prosecution in this space. Specifically, the Department will no longer target virtual currency exchanges, mixing and tumbling services, and offline wallets for the acts of their end users or unwitting violations of regulations,” the DOJ’s statement claimed.
The DOJ’s statement applies to cryptocurrency exchanges, wallets, and crypto mixers like Tornado Cash. It builds on the Department’s previous announcement today, claiming that it disbanded the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team.
The department gives itself room to prosecute individual bad actors, but only in specific circumstances.
However, the department is now moving on from crypto. According to today’s announcement, it will even drop any ongoing investigations against such entities immediately.
We will wait to see what happens with the Tornado Cash and Samourai Wallet prosecutions. But the memo from the Deputy Attorney General yesterday is right on target: we should be going after bad guys. Not the developers of good tools that bad guys happen to use. pic.twitter.com/h8taM5BvGm
— Peter Van Valkenburgh (@valkenburgh) April 8, 2025
Also, it will not pursue legal liability for developers whose code is used by others to commit crimes, and it has closed all active investigations.
While it was expected that the department would lower its crypto enforcement under Trump, the complete laissez-faire decision has caught the crypto by surprise. Following the news, Tornado Cash (TORN) surged nearly 10% today.
The Department also asked regulators to review victim compensation laws. Although this is arguably a victory for crypto, it may also enable future finance crimes.
The DOJ is disabling its ability to target criminals on exchanges and mixers, with little guarantee that it can enforce the law. In other words, it may be removing critical guardrails to prevent future disasters.
“Crypto lobby: ‘Sure, Trump nixed the Crypto Enforcement Team, directed Major Fraud prosecutors to stop prosecuting crypto cases, and is trying to exempt crypto platforms from the Bank Secrecy Act, but they wrote right here that they care about stopping crypto crime! Reject the evidence of your eyes and ears!’” claimed crypto researcher Molly White.
Overall, it’ll be difficult to fully predict the implications of the department’s new policy on exchanges. For now, this directive will give many crypto-related businesses the freedom to conduct operations as they see fit.
Hopefully, business will proceed as usual without any serious controversies.
Crypto giants Ripple and Circle are again in the spotlight, with rumors of a $20 billion deal surfacing after a $5 billion agreement failed to materialize. Experts are divided on whether Ripple will go all out to acquire the stablecoin issuer, with some considering the $20 billion deal too unrealistic.
This article examines the likelihood of Ripple’s $20 billion bid for Circle and its potential impact on the XRP ecosystem.
Will Ripple Buy Circle for $20B?
In the latest development within the XRP community, all eyes are on Ripple’s escalating efforts to acquire Circle, a move that could solidify its position in the stablecoin market. Ripple is said to be pushing forward with a new $20 billion proposal, following the collapse of its $5 billion Circle deal. While Ripple remains tight-lipped about its Circle acquisition plans, expert insights from Scott Melker (The Wolf Of All Streets) suggest CEO Brad Garlinghouse might be considering a substantial bid increase.
Community Questions the Alleged ‘Unrealistic’ Circle Bid
Despite increasing speculations of Ripple’s potential $20 billion Circle purchase, many question the viability of the deal. For instance, industry expert Dom Kwok suggested that the XRP platform’s final offer for Circle will likely fall within the range of $6 billion to $6.5 billion. His estimation is based on the typical acquisition premium, which is the amount a buyer pays above the target company’s valuation to incentivize the sale. This premium usually ranges from 20% to 30%.
Assuming that Circle’s valuation is around $5 billion, the expert asserted that a 20% premium would put the offer at $6 billion, while a 30% premium would put it at $6.5 billion. With this detailed analysis, the expert dismisses the rumors surrounding Ripple’s potential purchase of the USDT issuer for a whopping $20 billion.
Amidst these speculations, XRP lawyer John Deaton has brought up an interesting angle regarding the deal. The XRP attorney underscored the possibility of a “bidding war” between Ripple and Coinbase, a top crypto exchange, which already holds a minority stake in the stablecoin issuer.
However, if Ripple finally acquires Circle, one of the largest stablecoin issuers, it could be a game-changer for the former.