Dogecoin (DOGE) has had its fair share of ups and downs in the market. With Dogecoin still struggling around the $0.20 mark, many are left wondering if the $2 dream is still achievable. As the original meme coin struggles to reclaim its former glory, JetBolt (JBOLT) is quietly taking over the spotlight. With its unique features gaining remarkable traction, JetBolt’s groundbreaking innovations are becoming the talk of the crypto world.
While Dogecoin attempts to regain its footing, the question remains—is Dogecoin’s $2 dream still alive? Or is it time for a new contender like JetBolt to take the market center stage? Let’s dive into Dogecoin’s latest price predictions, explore whether DOGE at $2 is realistic, and discuss the young crypto disruptor that shows no signs of stopping.
Dogecoin’s Future Path and the Hurdles: Is $2 Realistic for DOGE in 2025?
With its price lingering currently at $0.2155, far from its all-time high of $0.7376, the powerhouse meme coin Dogecoin (DOGE) has faced notable challenges in recent months. Even after a modest 9.33% increase in the last 24 hours, DOGE has struggled to maintain momentum enough to recover from an 18.93% decline over the past month.
Additionally, Dogecoin’s technical outlook is mixed, with crypto analysts noting that DOGE must hold above the $0.20 support level to avoid further losses. While some predict a slow recovery, with price targets of $0.50 to $0.82 by year-end, $2 seems increasingly unlikely—at least for now.
Furthermore, recent market conditions and macroeconomic factors, including inflation and liquidity constraints, have added to the pioneer meme coin’s challenges. Moreover, as whales continue to accumulate DOGE tokens, the overall market sentiment remains cautious, with many questioning whether the hype surrounding Dogecoin can drive it to new heights.
In recent news, Charles Hoskinson, the founder of Cardano, recently proposed a collaboration with Elon Musk to make Dogecoin the currency of X. If this ambitious partnership comes to fruition, it could dramatically impact Dogecoin’s future, possibly giving DOGE the boost it needs to reach new heights and solidify its place in the mainstream financial ecosystem.
Charles Hoskinson, Cardano founder, proposes to Elon Musk making Dogecoin the currency of X in an exciting post on X; posted by dogegod (@_dogegod_) on X
As 2025 progresses, the real question remains: Can Dogecoin break out of its slump, or is the $2 target simply out of reach? While Dogecoin’s journey to $2 seems increasingly uncertain, its future remains tied to market sentiment and the strength of its community. On the other hand, JetBolt (JBOLT) is forging new ground with its groundbreaking presale, reeling in crypto whales with its zero-gas technology.
JetBolt (JBOLT): The Zero-Gas Revolution That’s Disrupting older gen coins like DOGE
JetBolt (JBOLT) is an explosive force, racing ahead during its presale like a rocket fueled by innovation. With over 340 million JBOLT tokens already snapped up, this rising crypto superstar appears as a seismic shift in the blockchain space.
JetBolt’s zero-gas technology is eliminating the dreaded gas fees that have long plagued the crypto world while being powered by the Skale Network. On top of making transactions gas-free, this innovative technology is also creating a new frontier for developers.
But here’s where it gets even more exciting—JetBolt’s easy-to-earn staking mechanism is designed to make engagement as simple as a few clicks even for crypto beginners, thanks to its sleek Web3 wallet. What’s more, JetBolt takes a detour from the usual rewards earned just through staking tokens. Stakers also earn from actively engaging within JetBolt’s platform—transforming interactions into exciting crypto rewards.
On top of that, JetBolt’s AI-powered crypto tool aggregates blockchain news in a high-tech and entertaining feed, directly into the JetBolt platform.
As JetBolt skyrockets, its traction is increasing. The Alpha Boxes are a game-changer, granting up to 25% more JBOLT tokens on batch token purchase—perfect for supercharging token holdings right from the start. With daily price increases and an operational ecosystem already in place, JetBolt’s presale continues to fuel crypto whale and buyer excitement in the altcoins realm.
Final Take: Dogecoin’s $2 Dream Faces Hurdles as Cardano’s founder teases the idea of collaborating on making DOGE the currency of the X social media platform.
As Dogecoin (DOGE) struggles to maintain momentum above $0.20, its $2 dream seems further out of reach. Meanwhile, JetBolt’s (JBOLT) presale continues to captivate whale interest, with its zero-gas technology and growing ecosystem showcasing distinct innovation in today’s market. While Dogecoin’s future remains uncertain, JetBolt’s unmistakable momentum could signal a new era for the crypto space—one where users gravitate towards new technologies and younger names.
Discover more of JetBolt’s game-changing features at
Note that this content is not trading or financial advice. Remember, any and all cryptocurrencies are unpredictable, with market conditions changing without any notice. Don’t forget to do your own research before engaging with any crypto. Proceed with utmost caution and awareness of the risks—crypto’s volatile ride is not for everyone.
Paul Atkins has formally taken office as the 34th Chairman of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The new pro-crypto SEC Chair is expected to hit the ground running with clear regulations in his second stint at the Commission.
Paul Atkins Begins Tenure As New SEC Chair
According to an SEC press release, Paul Atkins has taken over the reins of control at the US SEC. Per the statement, Atkins has taken the oath of office as the 34th SEC Chair after an edgy wait.
Atkins earned a nomination by US President Trump in mid-January before clinching a US Senate confirmation as SEC chair. Following Atkins’ confirmation by the Senate, final paperwork and the Easter holidays delayed his assumption of office.
“I am honored by the trust and confidence President Trump and the Senate have placed in me to lead the SEC,” said Atkins.
Paul Atkins is making a return to the US SEC after previously serving as a Commissioner between 2002 and 2008. Armed with decades of capital market experience, Atkins is pledging to maintain a “fair, orderly, and efficient market” with investors’ protection at the core.
Pro-Crypto SEC Takes Charge – Here’s What To Expect
Right out of the bat, digital asset enthusiasts are buzzing with excitement as Paul Atkins begins his tenure. The pro-crypto SEC Chair is expected to fast-track clear digital asset regulatory direction for the securities watchdog.
Following his assumption of office, Paul Atkins may make an appearance at the SEC’s third crypto policy roundtable. If Atkins joins the roundtable, the new SEC Chair will be in the thick of things for discussions around crypto custody with representatives from Kraken and Fidelity in attendance.
Atkins will lead the securities regulator as the Commission’s case with Ripple enters its final stretch. Following the approval of a joint motion to suspend appeals, pro-XRP lawyer says there are “no more excuses for delays.”
Paul Atkins will face a mountain of paperwork from cryptocurrency exchange-traded fund (ETF) applications on his desk. Currently, over 17 XRP spot ETFs are awaiting approvals from the SEC, with a pro-crypto Chair tapped to lend support.
Atkins’ assumption of office comes on the heels of Oregon filing a securities enforcement action against Coinbase, leaning on an old playbook.
Paul Atkins’ connection to cryptocurrencies runs deep, with the new Chair holding nearly $6 million in digital assets. Early in the day, Coinbase announced support for Linked Reserve Rights connected to Paul Atkins.
Coinbase is listing Reserve Rights (RSR), a dual‑token stablecoin platform aimed at creating a collateral‑backed, self‑regulating stablecoin ecosystem. Following the announcement, Binance’s ‘smart money’ traders are increasing long positions on the altcoin.
Incoming SEC Chair Paul Atkins was an early advisor for RSR, but he doesn’t maintain any active connection to the project. Nonetheless, RSR speculators may be anticipating some benefits from this old association.
Coinbase Lists RSR To New Enthusiasm
RSR has been active since 2019, aiming to upend the stablecoin ecosystem. It’s an ERC‑20 utility and governance token that underpins the Reserve Protocol, a dual‑token system designed to back and stabilize the Reserve stablecoin (RSV) at a $1 USD peg. RSR, a non-stablecoin, provides governance and backstop insurance to its counterpart.
However, an intriguing side effect has also taken place. As the asset prepares its debut on Coinbase, top traders on Binance are showing a strong bullish positioning.
Binance Top Traders Go Long on RSR. Source: Coinglass
On Binance, the top‑trader long/short ratio measures the share of total open positions held as longs by the top 20% of accounts by margin balance. A 65.48% long ratio means these “smart money” participants are overwhelmingly betting prices will rise.
Meanwhile, beyond Coinbase listing, RSR is getting attention due to its link with incoming SEC Chair Paul Atkins. Although Atkins disclosed his crypto investments and has no current link with RSR, he joined the Reserve Rights Foundation as an advisor in its early stages.
That isn’t to say that anyone has alleged that Atkins will engage in corruption to unfairly boost RSR. However, since becoming President, members of Trump’s family have been involved in several controversial crypto deals. This precedent may be encouraging traders to believe in the importance of political connections.
For now, market narratives are very important in this industry. As Atkins officially begins his career as the SEC’s new Chair, RSR may continue to receive indirect benefits.
The metrics used to measure outcomes can be misleading when evaluating blockchain performance. As more blockchain networks emerge, the public needs clear, efficiency-focused metrics, rather than exaggerated claims, to differentiate between them.
In a conversation with BeInCrypto, Taraxa Co-Founder Steven Pu explained that it’s becoming increasingly difficult to compare blockchain performance accurately because many reported metrics rely on overly optimistic assumptions rather than evidence-based results. To combat this wave of misrepresentation, Pu proposes a new metric, which he calls TPS/$.
Why Does the Industry Lack Reliable Benchmarks?
The need for clear differentiation is growing with the increasing number of Layer-1 blockchain networks. As various developers promote the speed and efficiency of their blockchains, relying on metrics that distinguish their performance becomes indispensable.
However, the industry still lacks reliable benchmarks for real-world efficiency, instead relying on sporadic sentimental waves of hype-driven popularity. According to Pu, misleading performance figures currently saturate the market, obscuring true capabilities.
“It’s easy for opportunists to take advantage by driving up over-simplified and exaggerated narratives to profit themselves. Every single conceivable technical concept and metric has at one time or another been used to hype up many projects that don’t really deserve them: TPS, finality latency, modularity, network node count, execution speed, parallelization, bandwidth utilization, EVM-compatibility, EVM-incompatibility, etc.,” Pu told BeInCrypto.
Pu focused on how some projects exploit TPS metrics, using them as marketing tactics to make blockchain performance sound more appealing than it might be under real-world conditions.
Examining the Misleading Nature of TPS
Transactions per second, more commonly known as TPS, is a metric that refers to the average or sustained number of transactions that a blockchain network can process and finalize per second under normal operating conditions.
However, it often misleadingly hypes projects, offering a skewed view of overall performance.
“Decentralized networks are complex systems that need to be considered as a whole, and in the context of their use cases. But the market has this horrible habit of over-simplifying and over-selling one specific metric or aspect of a project, while ignoring the whole. Perhaps a highly centralized, high-TPS network does have its uses in the right scenarios with specific trust models, but the market really has no appetite for such nuanced descriptions,” Pu explained.
Pu indicates that blockchain projects with extreme claims on single metrics like TPS may have compromised decentralization, security, and accuracy.
“Take TPS, for example. This one metric masks numerous other aspects of the network, for example, how was the TPS achieved? What was sacrificed in the process? If I have 1 node, running a WASM JIT VM, call that a network, that gets you a few hundred thousand TPS right off the bat. I then make 1000 copies of that machine and call it sharding, now you start to get into the hundreds of millions of ‘TPS’. Add in unrealistic assumptions such as non-conflict, and you assume you can parallelize all transactions, then you can get “TPS” into the billions. It’s not that TPS is a bad metric, you just can’t look at any metric in isolation because there’s so much hidden information behind the numbers,” he added.
The Taraxa Co-founder revealed the extent of these inflated metrics in a recent report.
The Significant Discrepancy Between Theoretical and Real-World TPS
Pu sought to prove his point by determining the difference between the maximum historical TPS realized on a blockchain’s mainnet and the maximum theoretical TPS.
Of the 22 permissionless and single-shard networks observed, Pu found that, on average, there was a 20-fold gap between theory and reality. In other words, the theoretical metric was 20 times higher than the maximum observed mainnet TPS.
Taraxa Co-founder finds 20x difference between the Theoretical TPS and the Max Observed Mainnet TPS. Source: Taraxa.
“Metric overestimations (such as in the case of TPS) are a response to the highly speculative and narrative-driven crypto market. Everyone wants to position their project and technologies in the best possible light, so they come up with theoretical estimates, or conduct tests with wildly unrealistic assumptions, to arrive at inflated metrics. It’s dishonest advertising. Nothing more, nothing less,” Pu told BeInCrypto.
Looking to counter these exaggerated metrics, Pu developed his own performance measure.
Introducing TPS/$: A More Balanced Metric?
Pu and his team developed the following: TPS realized on mainnet / monthly $ cost of a single validator node, or TPS/$ for short, to fulfill the need for better performance metrics.
This metric assesses performance based on verifiable TPS achieved on a network’s live mainnet while also considering hardware efficiency.
The significant 20-fold gap between theoretical and actual throughput convinced Pu to exclude metrics based solely on assumptions or lab conditions. He also aimed to illustrate how some blockchain projects inflate performance metrics by relying on costly infrastructure.
“Published network performance claims are often inflated by extremely expensive hardware. This is especially true for networks with highly centralized consensus mechanisms, where the throughput bottleneck shifts away from networking latency and into single-machine hardware performance. Requiring extremely expensive hardware for validators not only betrays a centralized consensus algorithm and inefficient engineering, it also prevents the vast majority of the world from potentially participating in consensus by pricing them out,” Pu explained.
Pu’s team located each network’s minimum validator hardware requirements to determine the cost per validator node. They later estimated their monthly cost, paying particular attention to their relative sizing when used to compute the TPS per dollar ratios.
“So the TPS/$ metric tries to correct two of the perhaps most egregious categories of misinformation, by forcing the TPS performance to be on mainnet, and revealing the inherent tradeoffs of extremely expensive hardware,” Pu added.
Pu stressed considering two simple, identifiable characteristics: whether a network is permissionless and single-sharded.
Permissioned vs. Permissionless Networks: Which Fosters Decentralization?
A blockchain’s degree of security can be unveiled by whether it operates under a permissioned or permissionless network.
Permissioned blockchains refer to closed networks where access and participation are restricted to a predefined group of users, requiring permission from a central authority or trusted group to join. In permissionless blockchains, anyone is allowed to participate.
According to Pu, the former model is at odds with the philosophy of decentralization.
“A permissioned network, where network validation membership is controlled by a single entity, or if there is just a single entity (every Layer-2s), is another excellent metric. This tells you whether or not the network is indeed decentralized. A hallmark of decentralization is its ability to bridge trust gaps. Take decentralization away, then the network is nothing more than a cloud service,” Pu told BeInCrypto.
Attention to these metrics will prove vital over time, as networks with centralized authorities tend to be more vulnerable to certain weaknesses.
“In the long term, what we really need is a battery of standardized attack vectors for L1 infrastructure that can help to reveal weaknesses and tradeoffs for any given architectural design. Much of the problems in today’s mainstream L1 are that they make unreasonable sacrifices in security and decentralization. These characteristics are invisible and extremely hard to observe, until a disaster strikes. My hope is that as the industry matures, such a battery of tests will begin to organically emerge into an industry-wide standard,” Pu added.
Meanwhile, understanding whether a network employs state-sharding versus maintaining a single, sharded state reveals how unified its data management is.
State-Sharding vs. Single-State: Understanding Data Unity
In blockchain performance, latency refers to the time delay between submitting a transaction to the network, confirming it, and including it in a block on the blockchain. It measures how long it takes for a transaction to be processed and become a permanent part of the distributed ledger.
Identifying whether a network employs state-sharding or a single-sharded state can reveal much about its latency efficiency.
State-sharded networks divide the blockchain’s data into multiple independent parts called shards. Each shard operates somewhat independently and doesn’t have direct, real-time access to the complete state of the entire network.
By contrast, a non-state-sharded network has a single, shared state across the entire network. All nodes can access and process the same complete data set in this case.
Pu noted that state-sharded networks aim to increase storage and transaction capacity. However, they often face longer finality latencies due to a need to process transactions across multiple independent shards.
He added that many projects adopting a sharding approach inflate throughput by simply replicating their network rather than building a truly integrated and scalable architecture.
“A state-sharded network that doesn’t share state, is simply making unconnected copies of a network. If I take a L1 network and just make 1000 copies of it running independently, it’s clearly dishonest to claim that I can add up all the throughput across the copies together and represent it as a single network. There are architectures that actually synchronize the states as well as shuffle the validators across shards, but more often than not, projects making outlandish claims on throughput are just making independent copies,” Pu said.
Based on his research into the efficiency of blockchain metrics, Pu highlighted the need for fundamental shifts in how projects are evaluated, funded, and ultimately succeed.
What Fundamental Shifts Does Blockchain Evaluation Need?
Pu’s insights present a notable alternative in a Layer-1 blockchain space where misleading performance metrics increasingly compete for attention. Reliable and effective benchmarks are essential to counter these false representations.
“You only know what you can measure, and right now in crypto, the numbers look more like hype-narratives than objective measurements. Having standardized, transparent measurements allows simple comparisons across product options so developers and users understand what it is they’re using, and what tradeoffs they’re making. This is a hallmark of any mature industry, and we still have a long way to go in crypto,” Pu concluded.
Adopting standardized and transparent benchmarks will foster informed decision-making and drive genuine progress beyond merely promotional claims as the industry matures.
