Animoca Brands revenue climbs as AI cuts costs by 12%

Bitcoin, the pioneering cryptocurrency, has reshaped how people worldwide perceive finance and money. However, as technology advances and external factors evolve, Bitcoin faces structural challenges that could impact its future existence and growth.

A recent discussion among industry leaders highlighted major risks that could pose a black swan event for Bitcoin’s future.

What Is the Biggest Threat to Bitcoin?

Lyn Alden, founder of Lyn Alden Investment, recently asked, “What is the biggest structural risk to Bitcoin in the next 5-10 years?” This question sparked significant attention and responses from investors, experts, and industry leaders, shedding light on pressing concerns.

One of the most frequently mentioned risks is the threat posed by quantum computing. Nic Carter, general partner at Castle Island Ventures, responded concisely: “Quantum.” His answer received widespread agreement.

“I increasingly agree. That was the catalyst for my thread/question, tbh,” Lyn Alden replied to Nic Carter.

Future quantum computers could break the encryption algorithms securing Bitcoin, such as the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA), which safeguards Bitcoin wallets. If a sufficiently powerful quantum computer emerges, it could forge digital signatures, allowing attackers to steal Bitcoin from any wallet with an exposed public key.

According to research by River, a quantum computer with 1 million qubits could crack a Bitcoin address. Microsoft has claimed that its new chip, named Majorana, is paving the way toward this milestone. This raises an urgent question: how much time does Bitcoin have before it must become quantum-resistant?

While the quantum computing threat is apparent, some argue that a more immediate challenge is whether the Bitcoin community can reach a consensus and implement quantum-resistant solutions in time.

“That’d be not coming to a consensus fast enough on the implementation of a quantum-resistant hashing algorithm,” Stillbigjosh, a former cybersecurity expert at Flutterwave, commented.

However, the founder of BlockTower, Ari Paul, pointed out that Bitcoin’s network faces a more immediate risk as attack costs have dropped significantly.

“Someone shorting 10%+ of BTC’s market cap then spending ~1/10th that to gain 51% control of hash power and mining empty blocks indefinitely, effectively turning off the network. Could fork the PoW algo, but just means the attack on the new network now costs <1/1000th the previous one,” Ari Paul noted.

The Risk of Conflict Between Bitcoin’s Decentralized Nature and Regulatory Oversight

Beyond technical challenges, some investors fear that government and institutional involvement will be Bitcoin’s biggest risk in the next 5-10 years.

“Government and institutional involvement changing the incentives of everything,” Investor Shinobi commented.

Data from BitcoinTreasuries shows that over the past five years, Bitcoin holdings by private companies, public companies, governments, and ETFs have surged more than 12 times, from 210,000 BTC to over 2.6 million BTC. As a result, regulatory intervention could introduce legal pressures or unwanted changes to Bitcoin’s fundamental operations.

“The biggest structural risk is the friction between Bitcoin’s decentralized ethos and the increasing push for centralized regulatory oversight. In essence, as governments and large institutions tighten control and enforce compliance, the network might be forced to compromise on its core principle,” Investor MisterSpread warned.

The discussion sparked by Lyn Alden’s question suggests risks that could trigger black swan events for Bitcoin. It also reflects the growing awareness among industry leaders and investors about Bitcoin’s systemic risks in an era increasingly shaped by political stability and artificial intelligence.

The post Bitcoin Future at Risk? Experts Discuss the Biggest Threats Over the Next 5-10 Years appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Cosmos (ATOM) is gaining strong bullish momentum, jumping over 14% in the last 24 hours as technical indicators flash potential for further upside. The token’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) has surged from deeply oversold levels to nearly overbought territory, highlighting an aggressive wave of buying pressure.

On the Ichimoku Cloud chart, ATOM has broken above the cloud with bullish crossovers forming, suggesting a possible trend reversal is underway. As the price nears a key resistance zone, traders are watching closely to see if ATOM can maintain this breakout and push toward the $6 mark in April.

Cosmos RSI Is Close To Overbought Levels

Cosmos has seen a sharp surge in momentum, with its Relative Strength Index (RSI) climbing to 68.11 after sitting at just 29 only four days ago.

This rapid rise suggests strong buying pressure over a short period, signaling a dramatic shift in sentiment. The RSI is a momentum oscillator that measures the speed and change of price movements, with values ranging from 0 to 100.

Typically, a reading below 30 indicates an asset is oversold and may be due for a bounce, while a reading above 70 suggests it’s overbought and could be primed for a pullback.

With ATOM’s RSI now nearing the overbought threshold at 70, it indicates that the recent price run-up may be nearing exhaustion—at least in the short term.

While a breakout above 70 could signal a strong bullish continuation, such high RSI levels also come with caution, as traders may begin to take profits or reassess entry points.

If momentum holds, ATOM could push into overbought territory and extend its gains. However, if buyers begin to fade, the price could see some short-term cooling as the market digests the recent surge.

ATOM Ichimoku Cloud Shows A Bullish Setup

Cosmos is showing a bullish breakout on the Ichimoku Cloud chart. The price has decisively moved above the cloud, indicating a potential trend reversal.

The blue conversion line (Tenkan-sen) has sharply turned upward and now sits above the red baseline (Kijun-sen), which is a classic bullish crossover.

This alignment reflects growing short-term momentum and could support further upside if it holds.

Additionally, the Leading Span A (green cloud boundary) has started to curve upward, while Leading Span B (red boundary) is beginning to flatten.

This shift is causing the cloud ahead to thin out, signaling that bearish pressure is weakening. With the price above the cloud and the lagging span (Chikou) clear of recent price action, the overall setup leans bullish.

Will Cosmos Rise To $6 In April?

With the recent price surge, Cosmos price is approaching a key resistance level at $5, and a breakout above it could pave the way for further gains toward $5.5 and even $6.

The current alignment of the EMA lines shows growing bullish momentum, and a golden cross—where a short-term EMA crosses above a longer-term EMA—appears to be forming. If confirmed, this signal could attract more buyers and reinforce the potential for a continued upward move, especially if volume supports the breakout.

However, if ATOM fails to maintain its momentum and the price gets rejected at resistance, the trend could reverse toward key support levels.

The first area to watch is around $4.83, and a breakdown below that could lead to further losses. $4.47 and $4.17 are potential downside targets.

The post Cosmos (ATOM) Surges 14% as Golden Cross Looms appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Following Mantra’s catastrophic OM token crash, analysts urge the Pi Core Team (PCT) to adopt greater transparency and caution.

These remarks follow Pi Network’s recent transition to the full Open Mainnet phase.

Pi Network Advised to Prioritize Transparency Post-Mainnet

The warning comes after OM’s price plummeted more than 90% in under an hour, wiping out over $5.5 billion in market capitalization.

Following this crash, there is widespread fear across the crypto industry of similar events occurring in projects undergoing key phases of development and token unlocking. Among such projects is Pi Network, which recently transitioned to Open Mainnet.

Dr Altcoin, a crypto analyst and advocate for decentralized ethics, relates the OM incident to the Pi Network and calls for stricter regulation.

“The OM incident is a wake-up call for the entire crypto industry, proof that stricter regulations are urgently needed. It also serves as a huge lesson for the Pi Core Team as we transition from the Open Network to the Open Mainnet,” he tweeted.

Some users defended Pi Network’s fundamentals, highlighting its utility-focused roadmap and avoidance of speculative hype. However, Dr Altcoin doubled down on concerns over a lack of transparency.

“One thing is clear about the PCT, they are not transparent,” he added.

Still, the broader Pi community remains optimistic. The account Pi Open Mainnet, presented as a pioneer, posted a rebuttal citing reasons Pi may avoid OM’s fate. It highlighted Pi’s slow token release strategy and absence of large early-sell events as elements central to that confidence.

“Massive community (35M+ pioneers), steady unlocks, growing utility (.pi domains, dapps), and a clean track record,” they wrote.

Indeed, Pi’s ecosystem is expanding. The integration with Chainlink, new fiat on-ramps, and Pi Ads are creating what the team calls a “virtuous cycle” of adoption and utility, according to Pi Open Mainnet 2025, a senior pioneer’s account.

“These advancements form a virtuous cycle for Pi Network. Easier fiat ramps bring in more users (Pi’s community is already ~60M strong), Pi Ads drive more apps & utility, and Chainlink integration adds trust and interoperability. More users →more utility,” it stated.

With a community reportedly approaching 60 million, many believe the project has a strong user-driven foundation, unlike OM’s more centralized dynamics.

Is This Enough to Prevent OM-Like Fate?

However, not everyone is convinced this will be enough. Mahidhar Crypto, a Pi Coin validator, urged users to withdraw Pi coins from centralized exchanges (CEXs) to prevent price manipulation.

“We have seen what happened to OM—how market makers dumped on users…When you deposit your Pi Coins on CEX, the Market makers will use bots to create artificial buy/sell walls to manipulate prices or Liquidity,” they warned.

This aligns with recent concerns about collusion between market makers and CEXs. Mahidhar also called for the Pi Core Team to scrutinize KYB-verified businesses and avoid listing Pi derivatives on CEXs, citing the risks of leveraged trading on still-maturing assets.

Further fanning skepticism is on-chain behavior tied to OM. Trading Digits, a technical analysis firm, pointed out that the “Pi Cycle Top” indicator, a pattern often signaling market tops, had triggered twice for OM since 2024, the most recent being just two months before its collapse.

“Coincidence or bound to happen?” the firm posed.

Will Pi follow a disciplined, utility-first path, or could it fall into the same traps that triggered OM’s downfall?

BeInCrypto data shows Pi Network’s PI coin was trading for $0.74% as of this writing, down by 1.36% in the last 24 hours.

The post Analysts Warn Pi Network Over Transparency After OM Token’s $5.5 Billion Collapse appeared first on BeInCrypto.