Bitcoin’s resilience appears to be positively influencing altcoins, with several gradually posting gains. Maple Finance (SYRUP) is making another attempt to reach a new all-time high in the coming days.
BeInCrypto has analyzed two other altcoins that investors should watch closely as they approach their all-time highs.
Maple Finance (SYRUP)
SYRUP is approaching a critical support level at $0.555, which is essential for driving the altcoin towards its all-time high (ATH) of $0.657. Currently, SYRUP is 18% away from reaching the ATH, and securing this support could propel the coin towards further gains in the near future.
The Parabolic SAR indicator is positioned below the candlesticks, acting as support and signaling a potential uptrend for SYRUP. This suggests that buying pressure may continue to build, helping the altcoin maintain its current position. If the trend persists, SYRUP could break past key resistance levels and move upward.
If the market conditions shift negatively or if SYRUP faces selling pressure, the altcoin could drop to its next support level at $0.496 or even lower. A decline to this level would indicate a weakening of the current bullish trend.
SPX6900 (SPX)
SPX is currently trading at $1.34, 31% away from its all-time high (ATH) of $1.77. The altcoin is encountering local resistance at $1.42, and if it surpasses this level, it will face further resistance at $1.55. These levels will determine the future price movement of SPX.
The Parabolic SAR indicates that the uptrend is still intact, suggesting that SPX could continue to rise. However, the altcoin will require strong support from broader market cues to breach the $1.55 resistance and secure it as a support level. This will be key to sustaining upward momentum.
If investor sentiment turns negative, SPX may experience selling pressure. A drop below the $1.25 support level would likely send the altcoin toward $1.14. Such a decline would invalidate the current bullish outlook, signaling a potential shift in market conditions.
Euler (EUL)
EUL has surged by 68% over the last two weeks, currently trading at $11.71. The altcoin is now 17.3% away from its all-time high (ATH) of $13.74. This price increase suggests that EUL is gaining momentum, and its next target could be the ATH if the bullish trend persists.
The Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicates strong inflows, supporting the positive momentum for EUL. With $11.02 secured as a support level, the altcoin has a solid foundation for further gains. If this trend continues, EUL could push toward its ATH of $13.74 in the coming days.
However, if EUL holders decide to cash out, the altcoin could experience a downturn. A drop below the support levels of $11.02 and $10.60 would likely push the price down to $9.89. This would invalidate the current bullish outlook and signal a potential correction in the market.
Bitcoin’s (BTC) market dominance has surged to 64%, reaching its highest level in over four years.
However, experts remain divided on what this means for the future. Some predict an impending altcoin season, and others caution that Bitcoin’s dominance could continue to suppress altcoins.
“Excluding stable coins, Bitcoin dominance is now at 69%,” Cowen revealed.
The rise in Bitcoin dominance has sparked debate among analysts about its implications for altcoins. Cowen believes there will be a correction or downward movement in altcoins before any substantial gains can be expected in the market. This implies that the altcoin season may not be imminent yet.
“I think ALT/ BTC pairs need to go down before they can go up,” he stated.
Nordin, founder of Nour Group, also expressed caution. He stressed that Bitcoin dominance is nearing the levels seen during the peak of the 2020 bear market.
“This isn’t just a BTC move. Its capital rotating out of alts,” he noted.
“Bitcoin dominance back to 64%. No Alt seasons in 2024 or 2025,” analyst, Alessandro Ottaviani, predicted.
On the other hand, analyst Mister Crypto predicts that Bitcoin’s dominance may follow a long-term descending triangle pattern. A descending triangle typically suggests bearish momentum, where the price or dominance gradually decreases as lower highs are formed.
However, this could prolong its market control before a broader correction allows altcoins to gain traction.
Another analyst mentioned that Bitcoin dominance is currently testing the resistance zone between 64% and 64.3%. Therefore, a possible retracement may be on the horizon. Should this retracement occur, altcoins could begin to gain traction, with some potentially emerging as top performers in the market as capital shifts away from Bitcoin.
“However, a breakout from this zone could mean further declines for alts,” the analyst remarked.
Finally, Junaid Dar, CEO of Bitwardinvest, offered a more optimistic view. According to Dar’s analysis, if Bitcoin’s dominance drops below 63.45%, it could trigger a strong upward movement in altcoins. This, he believes, would create an ideal opportunity to profit from altcoin positions.
“For now, alts are stuck. Just a matter of time,” Dar added.
Tether Dominance Signals Potential Altcoin Season
Meanwhile, many analysts believe that the trends in Tether dominance (USDT.D) signal a potential altcoin season. From a technical analysis standpoint, USDT.D has reached a resistance zone and may be due for a correction, suggesting the possibility of capital flowing from USDT into altcoins.
“The USDTD is in a rejection zone, as long as it does not close above 6.75% it will be favorable for the market,” a technical analyst wrote.
Another analyst also stressed that the USDT.D and USD Coin dominance (USDC.D) have reached resistance, forecasting an incoming altcoin season. Doğu Tekinoğlu drew similar conclusions by observing the combined chart of BTC.D, USDT.D, and USDC.D.
As Bitcoin’s dominance climbs, investors are closely monitoring these technical and on-chain signals. The interplay between Bitcoin’s strength and stablecoin dynamics could dictate whether altcoins stage a comeback this summer or face further consolidation. For now, Bitcoin’s grip on the market remains firm.
Worldcoin is redefining how digital identity is developed by centering on the human iris as its primary biometric. However, in doing so, Sam Altman’s company, which now goes by simply as World, has drawn scrutiny from individuals and governments alike.
According to Shady El Damaty, CEO of Holonym and expert in zero-knowledge cryptography, the World Network’s centralized infrastructure makes it particularly vulnerable to data leaks and exploitation. Given the project’s global reach, the consequences of such breaches can prove catastrophic.
A Universal Digital Identity
With artificial intelligence continually blurring the lines between humanity and technology, Altman’s most recent project has taken the concept to the next level.
World, an initiative the OpenAI CEO launched in July 2023, has a bold objective: to scan every eye on Earth and forge a universal digital identity for humanity.
At its heart lies the World ID, a privacy-preserving digital identity generated through a unique biometric scan of a user’s iris, referred to as “the Orb.”
“Worldcoin is the very first example of a company… that has the explicit mission of documenting every single person in the world with a cryptographically immutable link between a cryptographic hash of your eye and… your biometrics,” El Damaty told BeInCrypto.
In exchange for this biometric verification, users receive WLD tokens, World’s native cryptocurrency. These tokens serve as both an incentive and a fundamental component of participating in this global network.
The initiative is undoubtedly innovative. However, it’s also tremendously risky.
Why the Iris? Unpacking World Network’s Biometric Choice
Unsurprisingly, World’s launch has been received with skepticism.
While users have generally grown comfortable with biometric authentication, such as fingerprints for passport scans or Face ID to unlock smartphones, the prospect of having one’s eyeballs scanned to create a digital identity has elevated the feeling of living in a simulated reality.
“[World] settled on… the iris, which has enough entropy within it that it’s really difficult to brute force. They could have gone with fingerprints, but they didn’t because these can be very easily modified; they can be burnt off, or you could use different fingerprints. Whereas for eyes, they are very difficult to change,” El Damaty explained.
The reason behind World’s decision to use such a specific biometric is in line with its stated purpose.
As artificial intelligence continues to develop at a rapid pace, this initiative is a way to provide a trust layer for the world post-AI.
Orbs are available in 46 countries. Find one near you, and join the real human network today. pic.twitter.com/5K4aSbvDwT
This mission is often framed as creating “proof of personhood” in an era when distinguishing real humans from AI bots will become increasingly complicated.
“In the future, it might be really difficult to know who you’re interacting with, maybe both in the digital world as well as the physical world as robotics and automation continues to improve,” El Damaty added, noting, “With OpenAI, I think they really quickly realized that the most valuable commodity in the world isn’t going to be a currency or some hard asset, but it’s going to be authenticity.”
Though the cause may seem noble enough, the way World Network has decided to go about it has drawn scrutiny. Part of it stems from a fundamental disagreement on what digital identity should entail, leading to a philosophical divide.
Monolithic vs. Pluralistic Identity Systems
Worldcoin’s “one iris scan belongs to one identity” system embodies a monolithic identity. Experts often criticize such an approach for heightened security risks.
In a recent blog post, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin warned that such a singular, universally linked identity risks online privacy and individual freedom. He expressed concern that even with advanced privacy tools, a one-identity-per-person property brings several security risks.
“That’s the real risk. If someone takes a picture of your eyes, can they use all publicly available information, or maybe even dark web information, to identify who you are and what you’ve done on-chain,” El Damaty told BeInCrypto.
This approach also contrasts with the cypherpunk ethos that birthed Bitcoin, which emphasizes anonymity. Critics argue that World represents a significant philosophical shift away from this privacy-first tradition by permanently labeling individuals.
A specific point of concern for Buterin and others is World’s nullifier. This cryptographic mechanism ensures that each person signs up only once. However, its very function also presents a significant vulnerability.
“As soon as your nullifier is given up… all of the accounts that you have linked to that nullifier are also given up… it could be the foundation of a really massive data leak,” El Damaty warned.
In response to these risks, El Damaty advocates for pluralistic identity systems with multiple online identities for different purposes. This protects sensitive real-world information from being inextricably linked to a single, globally unique ID.
“Those iris codes shouldn’t be linked to the same amount of information that can be used to access your voting record or your social security benefits or other really critical information that, if ever given up, would undermine your status as a person in the real world,” he added.
This tension also forms the backdrop for World’s direct conflict with national governments.
Could Worldcoin Data Become a Government Honeypot?
World Network’s global scope directly challenges national sovereignty, especially a state’s right to define its citizens’ identity. This raises a critical question: What if foreign governments demand access to their citizens’ biometric data collected by this company?
Tools for Humanity, World’s parent company, might use its distributed infrastructure as a defense, claiming data resides in various nations. However, El Damaty believes this defense is precarious.
“[World] also ha[s] infrastructure in the United States that’s going to be beholden to the US government’s authority. The US can come in and say, ‘hey, we’re going to pull the plug and put your executives in jail if you don’t hand over all of the logs that are coming from this central server that’s responsible for coordinating the entire network.’”
This vulnerability transforms World’s vast biometric database into a potential honeypot for governments. El Damaty pointed to precedents like the 2018 CLOUD Act, which allows US law enforcement to compel US-based tech companies to provide data, even if stored overseas.
Many nations have not waited for such hypothetical scenarios to play out, leading to immediate and forceful regulatory action.
Countries like Spain, Portugal, Kenya, and Indonesia have either imposed bans or initiated investigations into World’s operations, citing concerns over data handling, transparency, and age verification.
El Damaty highlighted a crucial transparency issue. As a private company, World’s financial and operational details aren’t fully open for public scrutiny. This, he suggested, enables them to strategically control how they present their activities to the world.
This opaqueness contributes to existing global skepticism.
“I don’t think governments are going to suddenly turn overnight and say, ‘okay, well, we’re going to let this American company [from] Silicon Valley run by one of the world’s most powerful people to track all of our citizens and give them their crypto tokens,’” El Damaty said.
Without detailed clarity, many nations remain wary of entrusting such fundamental identity information to a private entity perceived to be operating outside established legal and ethical norms.
